Many online education platforms are very popular now. In the past year, there have been many educational platforms. It has become a big coffee, and everyone has to call the teacher when they meet. Of course, the teaching level here is also uneven, which lies in our picky. The educational equity brought by online education is to change educational resources from aristocratic to civilian.

For example, Mr. Xue Zhaofeng, a professor of economics at Peking University who was fired a few days ago, opened an economics course online. He studied for a year, and the price was only 199 yuan. Of course, this is good news for many people, because most people will never be admitted to Peking University. But because of online education, they can listen to the content of Peking University teachers' lectures, and perhaps the fate of many people will change.

On the other hand, although 6.5438+0.7 million people signed up for courses in Xue Zhaofeng, how many percent of these 6.5438+0.7 million people can fully listen to the courses, take notes and do their homework in this year? Online education does reduce the average distribution of educational resources, but it also makes many people unable to concentrate on studying a course in depth. Last year, for example, I signed up for at least ten courses, all of which were messy and irrelevant. The only thing I can listen well and take notes well is probably only one or two courses. Other courses are half-finished or not offered at all. Therefore, the unfairness of online education is the unfairness of interests. If you are not supervised to practice after class, there is no difference between taking this course and not taking it, which is the advantage of offline education. Therefore, online education is very suitable for those with clear goals and high self-discipline. Online education is a pit for people other than these people.