Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - What are the differences between China education and American education?
What are the differences between China education and American education?
One is a flower and the other is a seed. \ r \ nOne stresses formality and the other stresses practicality \ r \ n \ r \ The difference between education in China and education in the United States is that education in China is rigorous, while education in the United States is free, but the crime rate in China is much higher than that in the United States. Because they give students the right to make mistakes, parents and teachers should not deprive students of the right to make mistakes, otherwise they will feel depressed. \ r \ China and the United States have different cultural and historical backgrounds and different education. Many people think that China's basic education is solid, and some American educators are also calling for learning basic education from Asia, including China. "Math prodigy" and "Math idiot" \ r \ n \ r \ Let's first look at how China people educate their children. Many people think that children are like an empty bottle, with a particularly strong absorption capacity, so they instill knowledge into it in a planned, purposeful and step-by-step manner. Teach them to recite Tang poems and ancient teachings. Although they may not understand it, let them passively absorb it first, then slowly digest it, and finally integrate this knowledge. \ r \ n \ r \ Americans try their best to let children play, and advocate that children's exploratory nature should be used to get in touch with nature, understand the real world and build a cognitive foundation. Let children feel the size, shape, color and texture with five senses, and feel the meaning of numbers with heart, not just get the correct answer. They believe that children can't learn abstractly like older children or adults, but can only use their impressions of the real world to establish logical thinking. Children in China can know that 3+4=7 even if they don't understand it. Memorizing the multiplication table is just parroting. \ r \ n \ r \ Some people may ask, what can children learn while playing? When Piaget, a Swiss psychologist, observed his 10-month-old son, he found that the child always tore the bread into pieces and threw it on the ground, and observed the landing point of the bread very intently. Children's throwing behavior is not worth making a fuss about, but many parents will tell their children not to throw things when you pick things up, but rarely think about their motives for throwing things. Piaget found that it may be the process of children exploring and learning gravity. Why did the bread fall? The balloon will float? Will the milk come out? Children began to understand and experience the world. \ r \ n \ r \ nIn the first grade class of American elementary schools, teachers may ask, "What is 7+8?" China children can immediately answer "15" without thinking. What a genius! American children may not have enough fingers, but they should take off their shoes and use their hands and feet. They are so stupid! American students are notorious for their poor math skills. It seems that China's education cultivates "math prodigies"; American education, on the other hand, trains "mathematical idiots". \ r \ n \ r \ But where did all those "Chinese prodigies" go when they grew up? Throughout the history of modern world science, western education, especially American education, has trained a large number of top scientists. Here is a question, is learning for grades or for application and innovation? \ r \ n Of course, today's Hua Er generation in North China, although influenced to some extent by American traditional educational ideas, is no less than that of the United States, with engineers, postdoctoral fellows and professionals everywhere. \ r \ n \ r \ nPay attention to results and processes \ r \ n \ r \ nOthers think that American education pays attention to universality, while China education is narrow and deep. I think this evaluation is not accurate enough. Without in-depth research, how can Americans win most Nobel Prizes? \ r \ n \ r \ American education attaches importance to reading rather than reciting, because extensive reading can increase extensive background knowledge, broaden horizons and enrich imagination; Recitation may be bound by predecessors' thinking and it is difficult to innovate. \ r \ n \ r \ American education allows students to do projects, and through inquiry learning, they can do more in-depth research on a certain topic. When a student studies a subject deeply, he needs to read a lot of materials, learn relevant knowledge and think about the problems to be solved. Then do experiments, write papers, answer questions and defend. Looking back, I have not only undergone comprehensive training in reading and writing, but also learned knowledge far beyond the scope of textbooks. Everyone's energy is limited, and it is impossible to discuss all the main topics in depth. It is important to exercise and cultivate the ability of in-depth study and research through inquiry. With extensive knowledge and the ability to study and study in depth, won't you achieve a profound goal? \ r \ n \ r \ Education is a cause that needs the support of the whole society. Many experiments of American high school students who entered the final of the Intel Science Prize competition were completed in university laboratories. Most of the instructors are university professors, and their grades have a certain weight, not pediatrics. These winners also have excellent exam results. The United States also devolves many basic university courses to high schools and gives them to capable students, whose achievements can be recognized by universities. \ r \ n \ r \ However, there are many problems in American basic education, and the standards are uneven. Under the guidance of the concept of happy childhood, children have no pressure to study, which leads to many students not studying hard, which is a great waste of educational resources. Some of them can't remember the multiplication table of 1999 in the fourth and fifth grades of primary school, and they can't leave the calculator when they graduate from high school. These are far from quality education. \ r \ n \ r \ Education in China mostly aims at taking exams, emphasizing recitation and reciting, and only practicing repeatedly within the scope of exams, practice makes perfect. But whether it can really cultivate the ability to solve problems is worth discussing. Is it an efficient study to take the last year of high school as a sprint to review for the exam? That may be a waste of time. \ r \ n \ r \ The students are being trained, so they shouldn't take the results too seriously. If you don't pay attention to the process of understanding, it is difficult to apply what you have learned, and it is even more difficult to innovate. It is nothing new that American schools stress students' comprehensive evaluation, and the top candidate in the college entrance examination is rejected by prestigious schools. Think about the top universities in the world today. How much is the United States? Most of their students come from American high school students. If first-class universities are all second-rate and third-rate students, how long can first-class universities last? \ r \ n \ r \ nBelieve in authority and pursue truth \ r \ n \ r \ nIn recent years, the author has returned to China many times, and many children of relatives and friends are geniuses. However, the expectation in parents' eyes and the cruelty reflected in school scores also filled children's hearts with sadness. These children are losing curiosity, self-confidence and creativity. The students trained by passive learning and active exploration are different. The former is looking for standards \ r \ The first difference is that countries are different: one is China; One is America. \ r \ The second difference is different thinking: China has a culture of 5,000 years; America is only 200 years old. \ r \ The third difference is the different teaching methods: ducks are added in China; The United States develops brain power. \ r \ The fourth difference is the difference of entering a higher school: China adopts the elimination system of entering a higher school; The United States adopts the tutorial system. \ r \ The fifth difference is the different tuition fees: the tuition fees in China are insanely high; American tuition is equally affordable. \ r \ The sixth difference is the difference in employment: graduation from China means unemployment; America is a part-time job and study. \ r \ The seventh difference is the different recognition of diplomas: China's university diplomas are not recognized in many countries, but not in the United States. \ r \ Finally, I think the biggest difference is the difference in textbooks: China's textbooks are read for nothing; America is more practical. \ r \ nAlthough the language is sharp, the difference between education in .............. \ r \ China and education in the United States is that education in China is rigorous, while education in the United States is free, but the crime rate in China is much higher than that in the United States. Because they give students the right to make mistakes, parents and teachers should not deprive students of the right to make mistakes, otherwise they will feel depressed. \ r \ China and the United States have different cultural and historical backgrounds and different education. Many people think that China's basic education is solid, and some American educators are also calling for learning basic education from Asia, including China. "Math prodigy" and "Math idiot" \ r \ n \ r \ Let's first look at how China people educate their children. Many people think that children are like an empty bottle, with a particularly strong absorption capacity, so they instill knowledge into it in a planned, purposeful and step-by-step manner. Teach them to recite Tang poems and ancient teachings. Although they may not understand it, let them passively absorb it first, then slowly digest it, and finally integrate this knowledge. \ r \ n \ r \ Americans try to let children play, and advocate using children's exploratory nature to establish a cognitive foundation by letting them get in touch with nature and understand the real world. Let children feel the size, shape, color and texture with five senses, and feel the meaning of numbers with heart, not just get the correct answer. They believe that children can't learn abstractly like older children or adults, but can only use their impressions of the real world to establish logical thinking. Children in China can know that 3+4=7 even if they don't understand it. Memorizing the multiplication table is just parroting. \ r \ n \ r \ Some people may ask, what can children learn while playing? When Piaget, a Swiss psychologist, observed his 10-month-old son, he found that the child always tore the bread into pieces and threw it on the ground, and observed the landing point of the bread very intently. Children's throwing behavior is not worth making a fuss about, but many parents will tell their children not to throw things when you pick things up, but rarely think about their motives for throwing things. Piaget found that it may be the process of children exploring and learning gravity. Why did the bread fall? The balloon will float? Will the milk come out? Children began to understand and experience the world. \ r \ n \ r \ nIn the first grade class of American elementary schools, teachers may ask, "What is 7+8?" China children can immediately answer "15" without thinking. What a genius! American children may not have enough fingers, but they should take off their shoes and use their hands and feet. They are so stupid! American students are notorious for their poor math skills. It seems that China's education cultivates "math prodigies"; American education, on the other hand, trains "mathematical idiots". \ r \ n \ r \ But where did all those "Chinese prodigies" go when they grew up? Throughout the history of modern world science, western education, especially American education, has trained a large number of top scientists. Here is a question, is learning for grades or for application and innovation? \ r \ n Of course, today's Hua Er generation in North China, although influenced to some extent by American traditional educational ideas, is no less than that of the United States, with engineers, postdoctoral fellows and professionals everywhere. \ r \ n \ r \ nPay attention to results and processes \ r \ n \ r \ nOthers think that American education pays attention to universality, while China education is narrow and deep. I think this evaluation is not accurate enough. Without in-depth research, how can Americans win most Nobel Prizes? \ r \ n \ r \ American education attaches importance to reading rather than reciting, because extensive reading can increase extensive background knowledge, broaden horizons and enrich imagination; Recitation may be bound by predecessors' thinking and it is difficult to innovate. \ r \ n \ r \ American education allows students to do projects, and through inquiry learning, they can do more in-depth research on a certain topic. When a student studies a subject deeply, he needs to read a lot of materials, learn relevant knowledge and think about the problems to be solved. Then do experiments, write papers, answer questions and defend. Looking back, I have not only undergone comprehensive training in reading and writing, but also learned knowledge far beyond the scope of textbooks. Everyone's energy is limited, and it is impossible to discuss all the main topics in depth. It is important to exercise and cultivate the ability of in-depth study and research through inquiry. With extensive knowledge and the ability to study and study in depth, won't you achieve a profound goal? \ r \ n \ r \ Education is a cause that needs the support of the whole society. Many experiments of American high school students who entered the final of the Intel Science Prize competition were completed in university laboratories. Most of the instructors are university professors, and their grades have a certain weight, not pediatrics. These winners also have excellent exam results. The United States also devolves many basic university courses to high schools and gives them to capable students, whose achievements can be recognized by universities. \ r \ n \ r \ However, there are many problems in American basic education, and the standards are uneven. Under the guidance of the concept of happy childhood, children have no pressure to study, which leads to many students not studying hard, which is a great waste of educational resources. Some of them can't remember the multiplication table of 1999 in the fourth and fifth grades of primary school, and they can't leave the calculator when they graduate from high school. These are far from quality education. \ r \ n \ r \ Education in China mostly aims at taking exams, emphasizing memorization and memorization, and only practicing repeatedly within the scope of exams, practice makes perfect. But whether it can really cultivate the ability to solve problems is worth discussing. Is it an efficient study to take the last year of high school as a sprint to review for the exam? That may be a waste of time. \ r \ n \ r \ The students are being trained, so they shouldn't take the results too seriously. If you don't pay attention to the process of understanding, it is difficult to apply what you have learned, and it is even more difficult to innovate. It is nothing new that American schools stress students' comprehensive evaluation, and the top candidate in the college entrance examination is rejected by prestigious schools. Think about the top universities in the world today. How much is the United States? Most of their students come from American high school students. If first-class universities are all second-rate and third-rate students, how long can first-class universities last? \ r \ The difference between education in China and education in the United States is that education in China is rigorous, while education in the United States is free, but the crime rate in China is much higher than that in the United States. Because they give students the right to make mistakes, parents and teachers should not deprive students of the right to make mistakes, otherwise they will feel depressed. \ r \ China and the United States have different cultural and historical backgrounds and different education. Many people think that China's basic education is solid, and some American educators are also calling for learning basic education from Asia, including China. "Math prodigy" and "Math idiot" \ r \ n \ r \ Let's first look at how China people educate their children. Many people think that children are like an empty bottle, with a particularly strong absorption capacity, so they instill knowledge into it in a planned, purposeful and step-by-step manner. Teach them to recite Tang poems and ancient teachings. Although they may not understand it, let them passively absorb it first, then slowly digest it, and finally integrate this knowledge. \ r \ n \ r \ Americans try their best to let children play, and advocate that children's exploratory nature should be used to get in touch with nature, understand the real world and build a cognitive foundation. Let children feel the size, shape, color and texture with five senses, and feel the meaning of numbers with heart, not just get the correct answer. They believe that children can't learn abstractly like older children or adults, but can only use their impressions of the real world to establish logical thinking. Children in China can know that 3+4=7 even if they don't understand it. Memorizing the multiplication table is just parroting. \ r \ n \ r \ Some people may ask, what can children learn while playing? When Piaget, a Swiss psychologist, observed his 10-month-old son, he found that the child always tore the bread into pieces and threw it on the ground, and observed the landing point of the bread very intently. Children's throwing behavior is not worth making a fuss about, but many parents will tell their children not to throw things when you pick things up, but rarely think about their motives for throwing things. Piaget found that it may be the process of children exploring and learning gravity. Why did the bread fall? The balloon will float? Will the milk come out? Children began to understand and experience the world. \ r \ n \ r \ nIn the first grade class of American elementary schools, teachers may ask, "What is 7+8?" China children can immediately answer "15" without thinking. What a genius! American children may not have enough fingers, but they should take off their shoes and use their hands and feet. They are so stupid! American students are notorious for their poor math skills. It seems that China's education cultivates "math prodigies"; American education, on the other hand, trains "mathematical idiots". \ r \ n \ r \ But where did all those "Chinese prodigies" go when they grew up? Throughout the history of modern world science, western education, especially American education, has trained a large number of top scientists. Here is a question, is learning for grades or for application and innovation? \ r \ n Of course, today's Hua Er generation in North China, although influenced to some extent by American traditional educational ideas, is no less than that of the United States, with engineers, postdoctoral fellows and professionals everywhere. \ r \ n \ r \ nPay attention to results and processes \ r \ n \ r \ nOthers think that American education pays attention to universality, while China education is narrow and deep. I think this evaluation is not accurate enough. Without in-depth research, how can Americans win most Nobel Prizes? \ r \ n \ r \ American education attaches importance to reading rather than reciting, because extensive reading can increase extensive background knowledge, broaden horizons and enrich imagination; Recitation may be bound by predecessors' thinking and it is difficult to innovate. \ r \ n \ r \ American education allows students to do projects, and through inquiry learning, they can do more in-depth research on a certain topic. When a student studies a subject deeply, he needs to read a lot of materials, learn relevant knowledge and think about the problems to be solved. Then do experiments, write papers, answer questions and defend. Looking back, I have not only undergone comprehensive training in reading and writing, but also learned knowledge far beyond the scope of textbooks. Everyone's energy is limited, and it is impossible to discuss all the main topics in depth. It is important to exercise and cultivate the ability of in-depth study and research through inquiry. With extensive knowledge and the ability to study and study in depth, won't you achieve a profound goal? \ r \ n \ r \ Education is a cause that needs the support of the whole society. Many experiments of American high school students who entered the final of the Intel Science Prize competition were completed in university laboratories. Most of the instructors are university professors, and their grades have a certain weight, not pediatrics. These winners also have excellent exam results. The United States also devolves many basic university courses to high schools and gives them to capable students, whose achievements can be recognized by universities. \ r \ n \ r \ However, there are many problems in American basic education, and the standards are uneven. Under the guidance of the concept of happy childhood, children have no pressure to study, which leads to many students not studying hard, which is a great waste of educational resources. Some of them can't remember the multiplication table of 1999 in the fourth and fifth grades of primary school, and they can't leave the calculator when they graduate from high school. These are far from quality education. \ r \ n \ r \ Education in China mostly aims at taking exams, emphasizing recitation and reciting, and only practicing repeatedly within the scope of exams, practice makes perfect. But whether it can really cultivate the ability to solve problems is worth discussing. Is it an efficient study to take the last year of high school as a sprint to review for the exam? That may be a waste of time. \ r \ n \ r \ The students are being trained, so they shouldn't take the results too seriously. If you don't pay attention to the process of understanding, it is difficult to apply what you have learned, and it is even more difficult to innovate. It is nothing new that American schools stress students' comprehensive evaluation, and the top candidate in the college entrance examination is rejected by prestigious schools. Think about the top universities in the world today. How much is the United States? Most of their students come from American high school students. If first-class universities are all second-rate and third-rate students, how long can first-class universities last? \ r \ n \ r \ nBelieve in authority and pursue truth \ r \ n \ r \ nIn recent years, the author has returned to China many times, and many children of relatives and friends are geniuses. However, the expectation in parents' eyes and the cruelty reflected in school scores also filled children's hearts with sadness. These children are losing curiosity, self-confidence and creativity. The students trained by passive learning and active exploration are different. The former is looking for standards.