Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - What is the argument that "the popular science education in China needs more official power"?
What is the argument that "the popular science education in China needs more official power"?
Argument: Popular science education in China needs more official power. Objection: Popular science education in China needs to rely more on non-governmental forces.

First of all, popular science education means to carry out popular science education without violating scientific facts, so as to gain public support and attention. Official power refers to organizations or groups specially established or funded by the government, all or part of whose functions are scientific dissemination and popularization, such as science and technology bureaus at all levels, science and technology associations at all levels, and various public science and technology museums.

Non-governmental forces refer to organizations or groups that are spontaneously organized by the people, with little or no government funding support, and whose important functions are scientific dissemination and popularization. For this debate, our comparison standard is which can make the popular science education in China more correct, broader, deeper and healthier. Therefore, we think that the popular science education in China needs to rely on the official power.

Extended data

There are four people in each team, divided into one debate, two debates, three debates and four debates; Others are divided into one debate, two debates, three debates and free speech, and seats are arranged from the center to the side of the debate field in this order. But sometimes different things happen. Among them, the first debate is mainly about expounding one's own views, which requires the skills to the point and the ability to discuss in depth, so the first debate is required to have the ability to speak and infect.

The debate on the 23rd is mainly aimed at our own point of view. We should compete fiercely with the debaters of the other side, requiring them to have strong logical thinking ability and extraordinary reaction ability, be able to seize the flaws of the other side, expose them for their own use, be flexible and humorous, and drive the atmosphere on the field. If the four debates can sum up their own views well and develop and sublimate, it needs passion and eloquence to bring the atmosphere to another climax.