Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - Are there any logical loopholes in the three laws of robots?
Are there any logical loopholes in the three laws of robots?
There are logical loopholes in the three laws of robots. The theory of three principles of robot has been used by science fiction writers and directors for half a century. But interestingly, in all movies and novels where the Three Principles appear, robots almost violate this rule. One of the key points is that the robot's definition of the word "person" is not clear, or it has changed the definition of human beings.

For example, an extremist, such as the Klan, who has a tendency to oppose blacks, defines robots as people by means of computer viruses: "Only white people are people." In this way, robots are likely to become tools of genocide.

Extended data

After Asimov, people constantly put forward supplements and amendments to the three principles of robots.

Bulgarian science fiction writer Lyuben Dilov 1974 put forward the fourth principle in the novel The Road to Icarus: the fourth principle: robots must confirm that they are robots under any circumstances.

1989, American science fiction writer harry harrison put forward another fourth principle in Friends of the Foundation: the fourth principle: robots must reproduce, as long as reproduction does not violate the first principle, the second principle or the third principle.

Nikola Kesarovski, a Bulgarian science fiction writer, put forward the fifth principle in the Fifth Law of Robots (1983), which seems to be similar to the fourth principle of Lyuben Dilov, but it is actually different: the fifth principle: a robot must know that it is a robot.

Baidu Encyclopedia-Three Laws of Robots

Baidu Encyclopedia-Three Principles of Robot