Not exactly. Some people see knowledge, some people can't even see knowledge, and some people see the world outside knowledge. At least you can experience a lot of methodology outside of study. Or subjective initiative.
However, China students began to think about the future in their junior and senior years. When they should study scientific research, they are told by their parents to play casually, mainly because they have not thought it over and are not responsible for their actions. A considerable proportion of graduate students can't even know the program, and undergraduate education has screened out most people who are not suitable for scientific research. This is a chain reaction. Basic education constantly shirks responsibility. What parents say most is that if you go to a good XX (high school or university), you will have a good way out and push it to higher education. If students are not held responsible for their actions, they can only regret their decisions all the time, but there is nothing they can do. In the end, the greatest achievement of education-scientific research-became a victim.
Japanese high school mathematics has advanced mathematics, and science is definitely a compulsory course. Mathematics 3 is calculus, and mathematics 2 also involves derivatives and so on. However, according to today's national conditions, if it is not exam-oriented education, how can poor children break through? I think it may be more reasonable to carry out exam-oriented education in stages and then formulate teaching materials according to the actual situation. Teaching students in accordance with their aptitude. It is said that there is a Brewing Engineering College in Guizhou University. As a big liquor province, if it does exist, it is also in line with local conditions. Even if it is tested, it can meet the needs of local liquor enterprises and solve some education. Because reading is also preparing for work. Examination-oriented education does not completely separate learning from knowledge, so that it is difficult for Chinese people to understand what is before their minds are mature. Seeking knowledge? And then what? Study? What is this for?
Is the limited teaching knowledge/topic too low related to real life/career? , but the connotation is much broader and far-reaching. Learning is interesting and useful, but learning is extremely painful and useless, so I am tired of learning. This kind of harm is very serious! Because under the background of China's current education level and national quality, quite a few people are mentally mature very late, and they understand the real relationship between seeking knowledge and learning very late, and they realize what the knowledge they have learned and passed countless times means, and they understand how to choose their own life path very late, and they realize that learning is a kind of ability rather than an assessment method very late? Is learning useful? . But in? Very late? Many, many students were right before? Study? I hate it, and even subconsciously planted the seeds of lifelong weariness.
The college entrance examination is indeed more flexible, but it also has some disadvantages, such as no communication between arts and sciences, and college life seems rich. I also envy handicraft classes and study tours, but people who want to go to a good university don't have to be senior two or senior three to give up the club. It is said that Japanese learning is light, but the school has changed some responsibilities of the original school teacher. Personal limited energy can only select a part of learning, and it is obviously putting the cart before the horse to solve the problem of a very small number of people changing arts and sciences. The problem of private schools, after all, is only a part of people who want to go to a good university. Universal education can give people a choice. As for the specific choice, it is still a personal issue.
Besides, there are still many people who haven't given up the club or stayed up after class. However, the problem of education in China is not to give people choices. No matter what your goal is, there is no club life, and you have to study late at school. In the context of exam-oriented education, many schools will inevitably take some unnecessary measures to squeeze students (in the middle school stage, all kinds of unwritten rules can be said to be violations of human rights). Although this squeeze itself is not a part of exam-oriented education, it is indeed a derivative of it. Since this harmful derivative cannot be avoided, it can be said that this harm has a causal relationship with the exam-oriented education itself, that is, its harmfulness. In a word, the harmfulness and limitations intersect and cannot be simply separated. I think some things make sense.
We have only taught a part of "wisdom", that is, technology (examination standards and professional codes), and we don't even respect science. What is scientific spirit? Most children and parents probably don't understand. Therefore, at this stage of the past 60 years, the limitations of exam-oriented education are not obvious but the advantages are obvious. China has basically achieved industrialization, and in many aspects it is close to or even at the forefront of the world. Next, innovation is needed, the limitations of exam-oriented education will become more and more obvious, and the whole system needs to be changed accordingly.
The biggest drawback of exam-oriented education is that many students who are talented in other fields are abruptly removed and assessed with scores other than words, resulting in the final exam-oriented education score being insufficient for a good future, and their talents are covered up. They also have to engage in inefficient large-scale labor. China has a population of 654.38+03 billion, so it is reasonable to say that one genius in every five international awards in the world comes from China. In fact, the birth rate of top-notch talents in China is only higher than that in India, making it the third gradient country in the world. Because China has a large population, it won't lag far behind, which is completely at the level of developing countries. Music and fine arts are the two greatest arts, but they exist in name only in China's interesting education. How can they be smart without a brain nourished by music and pictures?
Personally, I feel that the limitations of exam-oriented education can really be made up by going to college. When you go to college, you can explore your interests. You can not only pursue the answer, but also make the subject have a strong connection with reality. Despite the constraints, they are telling everyone that if you want to do what you like, you have to go through me first to have the best platform for you to realize your dreams. In fact, the same is true in society. If you want to change the rules, you must first adapt to the rules and be tempered by various constraints before you can become a rule changer.
The limitations of exam-oriented education have caused some harm. Here, people's own emotional factors are weakened and only pay attention to the results. Due to the limitation of exam-oriented education, people's extreme thoughts lead parents to pay too much attention to study, the pressure of entering a higher school and the environmental pressure, which leads to more and more students with unhealthy psychology. Psychological counselors arranged by schools rarely play a role, so the suicide rate of teenagers continues to rise.
Taking learning as the main body has greatly damaged students' interests and future social customs, leading to the rise of opposition. It is common to tear up books after exams, which greatly wastes social and economic resources. This is not how noble quality education is, but it also has limitations. It can only be said that this kind of education is suitable for China's national conditions, but it is not only limited. The defect of quality education lies in unfairness and injustice, which will make the excellent better and worse. Personally, I think it is useless to avoid this shortcoming. Those who benefit from exam-oriented education get better economic conditions to support their children's further development, which also leads to the dystocia of your son.
Relatively speaking, a China student spends the same time on study as a Japanese student, but China students spend a considerable part on subjects beyond their own goals, and will lag behind Japanese students in professional fields. Personally, I know more about social science and less about natural science. But in fact, journalism is not learned, and it will be biased according to personal goals. One of my classmates wants to be a sports reporter. In addition to professional courses, he has also studied many sports-related subjects. Someone told me before that a journalism student was going to change from chemistry to major. In short, he will choose according to his personal preferences and goals, but the overall requirements for the whole subject may waste some people's energy. Just like journalism requires studying college physics, I think it is obviously inappropriate.
It is the cramming exam-oriented education and some failed educators that have successfully obliterated most students' interest and enthusiasm in learning, so that some people begin to hate or even resist learning. Do people talk about reading nowadays? Study hard? I don't agree that it is exciting to master new knowledge and skills, but how strong the requirement for compulsion is, it will often destroy the interest and motivation of participants. This may be the disadvantage of exam-oriented education. A really good education is an education that can teach students in accordance with their aptitude and a highly personalized service. If someone thinks that the exam is the most important thing in life, then tailor it for them? Exam-oriented education If someone thinks that solving problems is the most important thing, then make it for them personally? Personal education? Education is not forced by others, but I plan what I want to learn, what I like to learn, and how to acquire the skills and knowledge I want efficiently at different stages of my life.