Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - In order to put an end to "gunmen", is it advisable for colleges and universities to try to "brush their faces" into examination rooms?
In order to put an end to "gunmen", is it advisable for colleges and universities to try to "brush their faces" into examination rooms?
Very desirable, as long as the technology and equipment are mature, it can be promoted nationwide.

Integrity should be reflected not only in the shopping mall, but also in the examination room. However, in today's educational form, scores have become the lifeblood of students. No matter whether students study hard at ordinary times or not, they have no confidence in improvisation during the exam, so there are various forms of cheating. From a moral point of view, cheating in exams is also a serious lack of integrity. In shopping malls, businesses that lose their integrity will inevitably be severely punished. Whether it is the cancellation of business cooperation or the loss of economic benefits, it is a punishment for its dishonesty, so as a student, if he loses his honesty because of cheating, he should also pay the corresponding price.

In order to ensure the fairness of the examination, it is understandable for colleges and universities to strengthen the supervision of examination rooms. Especially with the rapid development of intelligent technology today, many intelligent terminal devices have been able to provide corresponding auxiliary services for exam invigilators, such as face recognition system, which can effectively curb the behavior of taking the exam instead. There may be views that candidates are disrespectful, but the candidates' choice of cheating does not show respect for the invigilator and knowledge. Since you choose to take the exam, you should accept any security measures in the examination room.

Every year, there are a lot of news about the gunner test, which fully shows that the gunner test has formed the development trend of industrialization. As long as students pay money, no matter what major or level, they can be satisfied through intermediary services, but for other students who don't look for gunmen, this form of examination loses fairness. Colleges and universities, as institutions of higher learning that impart theoretical knowledge and cultivate moral quality, should adopt different ways and means to regulate students' behavior, whether in normal teaching or in maintaining examination order, so as to give full play to the advantages of intelligent devices. The application of this face technology is a good example, and I believe that the phenomenon of gunmen taking the test can also be completely eradicated.