I am a high school student. Our school often talks about "quality education" and "quality education", such as "life planning" and "cultivating the quality of international citizens", and they are not just talking about it. They really forced us to fill out a career questionnaire (more than ten pages) and let us give a speech in the whole school. Everyone was annoyed, but there was nothing they could do but bluff. In fact, quality education is not bad, but now the background of China is exam-oriented education. Although everyone is talking about "quality education" and "quality education", after all, the college entrance examination is still there, and what everyone sees most is undergraduate education. If quality education can compete with exam-oriented education in college entrance examination results, who doesn't want to have quality? For example, we are both sophomores now, and there are art classes and music classes (and the consequences of skipping classes are very serious). How good will it be to use these time to go to class? Again, quality education is for the future, and exam-oriented education is for the present, but beyond the present, where is the future? In fact, there are two obstacles to the implementation of quality education. First, under the current system, there are many people in China, and the fairest way to select talents is to take exams. But with more people, the competition will be fierce. If everyone studies hard, they can only take exams. The second is psychology. Everyone in China wants to be the first, and they have to take exams. Therefore, it is impossible to popularize quality education in China without fundamental reform.