If the off-campus training institution closes, the training institution will not pay the teachers. Do they have no money or just don't want to pay them? I think both are possible, or one of them, because the impact on training institutions is really great under the premise of double burden reduction.

First, there is no money to send. Because training institutions make money by enrolling students, they don't give outside students training now. Oh, the training institutions can't recruit students, they are all closed and can't make money. So, there must be no money to earn. As for whether there is no money to pay, there should still be money, but it is not enough to support the payment of wages. To put it simply, training institutions do not pay training teachers for this reason.

Second, I don't want to send it. This is similar to absconding with money. Because many training institutions do not pay teachers' salaries, they are also in arrears, because their money needs to be turned over, sometimes in advance and consumed in advance. Wages are paid by recruiting new students, so they don't want to be paid because of the influence of this policy. Anyway, they are all private enterprises, and some don't even have business licenses. To put it bluntly, they just throw whatever they want, broken cans and broken falls, scattered all over the floor. And if the teacher makes trouble, there is no harm, but it will have a bad influence on the teacher's image. Therefore, they have the courage not to send. This kind of situation can only admit that it is unlucky. However, in school, teachers can help students after class and earn money. This is normal income. ! ! ! ! ! !