Students always have to enter the "meat grinder" of the college entrance examination. Parents are worried that their children will fall behind. "1 kill a class, 10 kill a playground." It is necessary to get rid of the disadvantages of exam-oriented education and establish a diversified student training evaluation system.
Vigorously combating the chaos in cram schools has become the current policy theme.
Primary and secondary school students in China spend too much time on their studies, and the extra-curricular tutoring time is "ahead of the world", so school choice is still very common in compulsory education. According to the report of HSBC, 93% of parents in Chinese mainland are paying or have paid private tuition for their children, which is higher than the global average of 63%. Although parents in Chinese mainland have paid a lot for their children's education, which exceeds the global average, they are still not sure whether they are fully prepared for their children's future.
For the repeated extracurricular tutoring, this time we should be "real". Can parents appreciate it? Not necessarily. Because students always have to enter the "meat grinder" of the college entrance examination. Parents are worried that their children will fall behind. "1 kill a class, 10 kill a playground."
The underlying reason why parents also ask for cram schools.
Not only in normal times, but also on weekends, parents take their children wandering between various remedial classes, exhausted. Since the beginning of reducing students' burdens and the withdrawal of schools from the field of education, parents have become more and more tired and burdened, and various educational institutions have made great profits.
As many as 2,854 people signed up for the Chinese training class of a well-known teaching institution in Shenzhen. The price of 16 class is 1.600 yuan.
Is this expensive? It may be nothing for senior white-collar workers, but for a father who earns 6,000 yuan a month in Shenzhen, if he can save 3,000 yuan a month, 1600 is already the result of half a month's work, and this is only a Chinese training class with 16 class hours.
Some parents usually don't even want to buy a cup of milk tea, but they don't even blink when paying tuition. Because children are the center of the family and the future of the family.
The underlying reason is that the college entrance examination implements a single score evaluation system, and everyone is afraid that once they pass the exam, they will fall behind for life. The current training craze and competition craze are based on this. Parents send their children to training classes in the hope of learning more and gaining a competitive advantage.
In order to form a long-term mechanism to reduce students' burden through institutional innovation, it is necessary to get rid of the disadvantages of "one exam determines life" in exam-oriented education, establish a diversified student training evaluation system, promote personalized and diversified education in schools, and meet the needs of educatees to develop their personalities and interests.
How to solve the "3: 30 problem"
In addition, the "3: 30 problem", from 3: 30 to 5: 00, the children entrusted to the school, but they were not at ease in society, but the school had to spend more manpower and material resources for it, and what did you get? Teachers work longer hours and have heavier burdens. We should consider how to pay the cost, how to change laws and regulations, and how to accept the school. "Schools should not monopolize this matter, but they can guide social forces to come to schools." How to rely on social forces to solve this problem needs further exploration.
What if students "herd sheep" and play games instead of outdoor sports? This is really a problem. The time to reduce the burden has been taken away by the game, so it is better not to reduce the burden. So the key is school trusteeship, but this has become a new problem: trusteeship is to supervise learning. What's the difference from before? But what if it is interest cultivation and team activities, which can't be free, and the fees can conflict with the regulations of the Education Department?
Reducing the burden is not a one-time reduction, but also requires a series of systematic solutions.