Nowadays, many families let their children learn disciples' rules from an early age. Some people say that when using words, you need to ask clearly, and steal without asking. It means that when you need to use other people's things, you should clearly put forward your own requirements. Don't ask is stealing. It is natural for a 5-year-old child to see that the toy likes it very much, but if he takes it away without the consent of the store or pays for it himself, it is obviously theft, so who will be responsible for this process? The 5-year-old child has no capacity for civil conduct, but his guardian mother does. After discovering the problem, the mother's educational responsibility cannot be shirked, but it is not advisable for the mother to force the child to surrender to the police station, because this threatening education wastes the resources of the police station on the one hand, and on the other hand, it is indeed suspected of shirking the educational responsibility.

First, sort out the incident Recently, a police station in Fuzhou, Fujian Province received a surrender. The person who surrendered himself was a 5-year-old child. What he said shocked everyone: uncle policeman, mom asked me to come first. It turned out that the child and his mother were shopping outside that night, and the child stole a small toy because he liked it. After the mother found out, she was very angry and returned it in time, and criticized the child.

But on my way home, I happened to meet the police station. The child's mother wants to teach the child a lesson, let her go to the police station alone and confess her mistake to the police. After learning the truth, the police on duty enthusiastically pointed out the mistake of the child's behavior, informed the child of the bad consequences of theft, and educated the child to develop good ideology and morality from an early age. Finally, the little girl realized the seriousness of the problem and said that it would never happen again.

Second, the nature of the incident, children stealing from others must be well educated, but the act of sending children to the police station to surrender is open to question. The police station is a very serious place. If you really want your child to plead guilty, can you really enforce the relevant laws? Obviously, this is a waste of public resources. The child's mother wants to help her educate her child through the police, but if everyone does this, can the police station still work normally?

The responsibility of educating children lies with parents and schools. Five-year-olds dare to take things. On the one hand, they may have no corresponding constraints before, on the other hand, they may just not understand. Parents should solve the problem through their own guidance and education, not hand it over to the police.

Third, the thinking brought by the incident. In fact, this kind of education happens from time to time. This is not the first time. This kind of alarm and intimidation education shows the incompetence of family education, thus throwing the problem to the police. This does not conform to the law of education. Although a warning education can be given to children, can such a small child bear it psychologically? If the police didn't take care of the child's psychological characteristics at that time, it might leave a shadow in the child's heart. This is not a benign way of education. Positive guidance and education are what parents should do, not simple intimidation.

What do you think of this? Welcome to leave a message below to discuss!