The so-called inertial thinking is people's habitual ideology and habitual way of thinking in their daily work and life. With the deepening of the discussion on emancipating the mind, people's understanding of the old routines and habits exposed in their work practice is becoming clearer and deeper. Specific to the grass-roots procuratorates, it is mainly reflected in ten aspects: First, when organizing and implementing police officers' political business study in the whole hospital, some police officers still can't correctly understand and understand, their enthusiasm for active participation is not high, their study is in a passive state, and the actual learning effect is not ideal. Second, in team management, we are often used to focusing on the mainstream, sometimes ignoring the deep-seated problems of individual policemen and lacking the initiative to do detailed ideological and political work. Third, in work decision-making, I am used to seeking stability, my work standard is low, I can't see my own advantages and potential, I don't seek new breakthroughs in my work, and I stay at the original work level. Fourth, individual middle-level leaders are content with the status quo, but they work hard, not too hard, resulting in insufficient awareness of striving for Excellence, and some work can not meet higher standards. Fifth, emancipating the mind only stays in the form, divorced from the actual work of the department, and tends to be unconventional. Sixth, in specific work, we often start from the advantages and disadvantages of local economic conditions and the incidence of cases, resulting in fear of difficulties and lack of positive mental state. Seventh, in handling cases, there is still a sense of habit from confession to testimony, and it will not turn from evidence to confession for a while. Eighth, the habitual consciousness and behavior of presumption of guilt still exist in handling cases, and the evidence collection of innocence or light crime is sometimes absent. Nine is to pay more attention to punishment than education reform. In the face of all kinds of crimes, cracking down severely according to law occupies a major position in the consciousness of case handlers, so the education and reform of criminals' appearance is sometimes ignored. Ten is usage dogma, ignoring the social effect of handling cases. To solve these problems, we must first solve two ideological misunderstandings: first, we believe that emancipating the mind is a matter for leaders and economic departments, and has nothing to do with ordinary cadres and other departments; Second, emancipating the mind is only an innovation in work. Emancipating the mind should be regarded as a change in people's understanding and way of thinking. The purpose of holding a big discussion on emancipating the mind is to let people completely abandon the past mode of thinking, especially in action, to understand and solve problems with a new way of thinking and thinking on the other side of contradiction. Of course, we should also consider that the final result of emancipating the mind is to innovate ideas and work. Specifically, in learning, we should guide all police officers to learn what is urgently needed for thinking, understanding and work. Learning is not a simple and mechanical learning, but a combination of personal thoughts and work to form their own rational understanding to guide and influence their own thoughts and work. In dealing with the problem of team management, we must never underestimate the bad behavior of individual policemen. Every policeman should carefully consider and treat the influence of personal words and deeds on the collective, and resolutely put an end to fatal mistakes. In striving for the first job, we should have the spirit and temperament of being unwilling to lag behind and not admitting defeat. If everyone has this temperament, it will form a strong working motivation. In handling cases, to get out of the ideological misunderstanding of "the procuratorate handles cases", we should first think of respecting and educating the legitimate rights and interests of criminal suspects, and be good at effectively combining law with emotion. At the same time, we must firmly establish the consciousness of evidence first, otherwise the case will be passive and even come to a dead end.