Because the teachers of basic education are mainly at the county level, and the calculation method of "teachers' salary is not lower than that of civil servants" is generally the total salary allocated by the government divided by the establishment number. In detail, there are more than 20 department-level cadres in a county (city, district) in the eastern region, less than 300 department-level cadres, and other staff are below; The average number of teachers in a county is about 7,000, with senior titles accounting for 15%( 1050), intermediate titles accounting for about 40% (2,800), and others below the junior level. Then, the salary of general department-level cadres is almost the same as that of senior titles (which can be simplified as the senior titles are probably between the right place and the deputy place, and so is the middle level), the salary of department-level cadres is almost the same as that of intermediate titles, and the salary of clerks is almost the same as that of junior ones.

Therefore, the average salary of teachers must be higher than that of civil servants, because the proportion of civil servants at county level is extremely low. In fact, even though the salary of teachers is obviously lower than that of civil servants at the same level, the average salary of teachers is often very high because of the disparity in the professional title structure between the two sides. You can think that the senior professional title of 1050 directly raises the average salary of teachers in this area.

-

2. The intuitive concept of average wage and the difference of statistical caliber.

The average salary can be roughly estimated as the average salary income of local teachers with intermediate titles, or the average salary level of local teachers around 40 years old. Because five insurances and one gold are paid by units and individuals from financial funds, there is a huge gap between the salary expenditure of financial caliber and the salary of individuals. For example, the average after-tax salary of teachers in a region is 5,000 yuan (see the previous article), so the actual annual income is 60,000 yuan, but the salary expenditure of financial caliber is almost 1 1 10,000 yuan/year.

-3. Why does the Ministry of Education shout every year that teachers' salaries are still low?

Because teachers' salaries account for too much in local finance. According to the education statistics bulletin of the Ministry of Education in 20 18, there are1360,000 teaching staff in the national basic education department (excluding preschool education), all of which are borne by local finance. According to the calculation of 333 prefecture-level teachers in China, each prefecture-level teacher needs to support 4 100 teaching staff on average. Even if the average monthly salary is 5,000, the annual salary of local financial personnel is as high as 4.5 billion. If you are interested, you can search 20 18 local fiscal revenues of cities across the country and feel the impact of 4.5 billion on ordinary cities. Please note that among the 333 cities above the prefecture level in China, the local fiscal revenue exceeds 654.38+0 billion, less than 654.38+0/3. Therefore, for most local governments, the education system is a golden retriever beast; For the government with local fiscal revenue of several billion, the salary of staff has always been a big problem, especially the largest number of teachers.

Since the beginning of this century, a large number of cities in China have been vigorously developing private education, and at the same time, many public schools have been transformed into public private assistance. Do you really think it is "providing characteristic education services" and "meeting diversified education needs"? To put it bluntly, if the local government has no money and becomes a private school, the government will not have to pay the teachers in these schools. Strictly speaking, the term "teachers' salary is not lower than that of civil servants" only refers to teachers in public welfare schools. Not only the salaries of teachers in private schools are not covered, but also teachers in public welfare schools, because public welfare institutions have income.

Finally, don't talk about the Ministry of Education, even if the Ministry of Finance does, it's useless, because the wages of basic education are borne by local governments, so local governments should have the money to do this. For example, if there is no transfer payment from the central government for education in the western region, it is useless for you to remove the top leaders at the city and county levels in the western region, because there is really no money. If I remember correctly, 80% of the per capita public funds and various subsidies for students in the western region are shared by the central government, and education is basically run by the central government. Therefore, in order to ensure wages, the method is simple, and the national education system is changed to central vertical management, and the funds are unified from the Ministry of Finance. This is no problem. I have estimated that if the actual annual income of intermediate titles is 80,000, the salary of teachers alone is 65,438+0.4 of the central budget income, and the Ministry of Finance has to say that there is a lot of pressure.