For example, in the examination of a public institution, two candidates are recruited for this position, and the interview shortlisted ratio is 1:3. If two people from Tuhua Education have signed up for the training of this institution, Tuhua will not accept other candidates for this position. That is, other candidates who are shortlisted for the position with him will lose their qualification to register in the institution and cannot participate in the interview training of the institution.
Extended data:
Moreover, the more serious problem is that if the candidates who choose colleges and universities do not get high-quality training, and the competitors just choose stronger colleges and universities, and finally the competitors successfully pass the interview, then the so-called "protection" is actually a kind of harm! Moreover, judging from the training situation in recent years, the probability of candidates in the same position choosing the same training institution is very low.
There are many training institutions. If the institution that advocates "job protection" can't ensure that the competitors of the candidates it trains don't participate in the training of other institutions, it can't achieve "job protection"! Just like the meaning expressed by the word "job protection", this is the protection of the position, not the protection of the candidates!