First, poor rural infrastructure.
As far as rural infrastructure is concerned, tables and chairs may have been used for many years, slides and some modern equipment are relatively few, and teachers will be more restricted in teaching. The classrooms in the city are spacious and bright, and all the equipment is available. As the weather gets hotter and hotter, some rural schools may not even have electric fans, while urban schools are equipped with air conditioners. Like the rural school I went to before, there is only one toilet in the dormitory on the first floor, which is very inconvenient.
Second, the rural teachers are weak.
With the advancement of urbanization, teachers all hope to have a place in the city. Rural wages are relatively low, while urban teachers are paid more. Besides, it will be more convenient to work and live in the city. From the perspective of personal development, teachers who teach well will be better in the future. Teachers in rural areas will be more limited and unable to display their ambitions in rural areas.
Third, children in rural areas have a poor foundation.
Good students basically go to school in the city, some buy houses in the city, and some schools choose students away. Everyone is competitive, and there is a great demand for excellent young people. Teachers who teach in rural areas will have less sense of accomplishment, and the children they bring out will be more ordinary and have no hard work. For teachers, children and parents in cities cooperate more with teachers and schools, thus achieving good teaching results.
To sum up, it is a realistic problem that rural education can't catch up with urban education for the time being. Although education equity is advocated now, it seems that there is still a long way to go for rural education to catch up with urban education. Parents should pay attention to cooperate with teachers in peacetime and make more contributions to their children's education.