Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - Intellectual education is not good for defective products, physical education is not good for waste products, moral education is not good for dangerous goods, and aesthetic education is not good for f
Intellectual education is not good for defective products, physical education is not good for waste products, moral education is not good for dangerous goods, and aesthetic education is not good for f
Intellectual education is not good for defective products, physical education is not good for waste products, moral education is not good for dangerous goods, and aesthetic education is not good for fine products. How to understand this sentence? thank you All-round development of morality, intelligence, physique and beauty.

Moral, intellectual, physical and aesthetic education is the basic standard for positioning people's quality, and it is also the trend goal of human social education, so the education of human society cannot be separated from this fundamental principle. This is the case now, and it was the same in the past, except that in the past, we only paid attention to one word "virtue", a word "virtue" in different social times.

After liberation, the nature of the country is different, and the socialist era needs socialist education methods. Therefore, the party and the government have summed up the five-character education policy of "moral, intellectual, physical and artistic work". Qin is beautiful in chess, intelligence, books and paintings.

criteria for evaluation

June 2020 5438+1October 10 Minister of Education Chen Baosheng said that in the "five educations" of morality, intelligence, physique and beauty, physical education and labor education have always been considered as shortcomings. In 2020, in view of these shortcomings and weaknesses, we should promote the integration of physical education and education, draw a hard lever of aesthetic education, and build a responsibility chain of labor education.

In 2020, conditions, teaching and evaluation will be changed. It is necessary to continuously promote the evaluation of students' artistic quality, sum up local experiences and practices in bringing art subjects into the senior high school entrance examination, and bring school aesthetic education into the supervision, evaluation and assessment system, so as to turn "soft tasks" into "hard indicators".