Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - How to treat the behavior of school students who collectively spit out the principal's crying and can't change the principal of the food delivery company?
How to treat the behavior of school students who collectively spit out the principal's crying and can't change the principal of the food delivery company?
In the morning, I brushed Tik Tok and saw a message: the students vomited collectively, and the principal cried and could not change the food delivery company. The principal said that this food delivery company was invited by the Education Bureau, so even if more than 30 students vomited after lunch at noon that day, they could not change food delivery companies.

When the students vomited collectively, the principal hid his face and cried, "I can't change the food delivery company, I'm not a good principal!" " "Why is the headmaster so helpless? It stands to reason that students collectively spit, and it is very likely that they collectively ate unsanitary things. The students also said that the tofu they ate that day was a little sour and the braised dishes smelled fishy. If there is a problem with students' nutritious meals, parents must be the first to find the principal. But the principal said that this food delivery company was invited by the Education Bureau, and he had no right to choose a food delivery company. As the head of a school, the headmaster can't be the master of his own house. Who can make decisions? Whose responsibility is this? Who should parents talk to?

Sadly, the school doesn't know the law, and the Education Bureau doesn't know the law, but why doesn't it even have the rule of law thinking? Over the years, many schools and education bureaus have hired legal advisers. Is it difficult to encounter such an incident without consulting a legal adviser? Even if you don't hire a legal adviser, you won't consult a lawyer? According to Article 143 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) (hereinafter referred to as "Criminal Law") and Article 2 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in Handling Criminal Cases Endangering Food Safety, the box lunch produced and sold by this food delivery company caused more than 30 students to vomit collectively, which may be suspected of "production and sales are not safe" because it caused serious food poisoning consequences for more than 10 people.

The school shall report the case to the public security organ, and seal up and entrust an appraisal on whether the bulk food of the food delivery company meets the food safety standards. The headmaster cried in front of the camera, saying that because the food delivery company was invited by the Education Bureau, it could not be changed. Not only did he not take responsibility, but he was obviously excusing himself. When I encountered such a collective food poisoning incident, I didn't report it to the public security organ, but chose to cry in front of the camera. This is a satire on the school, and it is the sorrow of the school!