The conclusion of this paper on primary education can be written as a study on the delayed evaluation of primary education quality.

1. What problems are explained by the research results and what principles and laws (theoretical value) are revealed.

2. Significance and function in practical application (practical value).

3. Compared with the previous research results, what are the similarities and differences, and what are the amendments, supplements and developments?

4. Remaining problems, suggestions and prospects of the research. Of course, not all conclusion writing should have the above content. The author can decide according to the specific circumstances of the research results, but the first point should be essential.