A circular entitled "On the refusal of He Hongmei and He Lanfen of Suxian Middle School to answer questions from the staff of the Municipal Establishment Office" obtained by the reporter shows that the Suxian District Education Bureau of Chenzhou City is open to all primary and secondary schools and kindergartens in the whole district, and teachers of informed criticism Suxian Middle School are He Hongmei and He Lanfen. The specific reasons are: He Hongmei "refused to answer creative knowledge in an uncooperative way" and He Lanfen "pretended to be the parents of the students, did not answer, did not answer.
According to the document, their actions "violated the requirements of teachers' morality and school work, and had a negative impact on the creative work of the District Education Bureau and even Suxian District" and "seriously affected the image of the teaching staff in the education system in the whole region". Therefore, Suxian District Education Bureau gave him a informed criticism, deducted his performance salary in the third quarter (3 months), and cancelled the punishment of appraising the qualifications first in that year.
Informed criticism refused to answer the question of "Chuangwen", which caused controversy. This afternoon, a person in charge of the Suxian District Education Bureau Office in Chenzhou confirmed to the reporter that the above-mentioned notice document was issued by the Education Bureau Office on September 12. The person in charge said that on September 4, the staff of the "Chuangwen Office" entered Suxian Middle School for a spot check during the break, and the two teachers "not only refused to answer, but also had a bad attitude towards the inspection". Helanfen claimed to be the parents of the students when responding to the inspection. After being recognized as a teacher by his classmates around him, he "ran away and hid in other places".
The above-mentioned person in charge said that the two teachers involved were female teachers in their 50 s, and their behavior was "against the teacher's ethics." Students are required to behave in a civilized manner, and now the teacher is uncivilized. "It said that the notice document was shown to two teachers before it was released, and they had no objection". Within 15 working days after the document is issued, the teachers involved have the right to lodge a complaint, but "neither of them has lodged a complaint so far". The person in charge admitted that there are some problems in the expression in the document, including not indicating the basis for handling, which is "negligence".
The punishment of the two teachers is still in the appeal period, and the parties can appeal according to the procedure. Seems very open-minded. In fact, under the pressure of local levels, how much space teachers have to defend their rights is very intriguing. In fact, even if teachers don't complain, it won't affect public opinion's judgment on improper punishment. The public's dissatisfaction with that ticket is so strong that uncivilized creative behavior can stop.