For students with strong self-control, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, and a relaxed learning environment is more conducive to further broadening their thinking, emancipating their minds, enhancing their creativity and demonstrating their innovative ability.

For students with poor self-control ability, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. Such students will relax their mentality in a relaxed state of study. Maybe they are smart, but for students who have no self-control and judgment, a relaxed environment is really a disaster.

A digression: Confucius' 3,000 disciples can still teach students in accordance with their aptitude, but our current education is shepherd management or prison management. Are there really few teachers?

Off-topic 2: Both sides of the debate are too extreme. In order to win, we have to find a way to say that the black one is folded. The difficulty of winning or losing is important, but isn't truth and justice important? Do you have to defend which side you are assigned to?