When entering higher education, we don't look at the quality. The evaluation of higher education mainly depends on the students' learning ability and level, and will not judge the students' morality and quality. Moreover, most people do things secretly, and there are no obvious moral problems, so they will naturally stay in the system of higher education and will not be screened out by the evaluation system of higher education. Some people with poor quality in most news are bad behaviors after leaving campus, and these people will not have any cross-border performance on campus. The social relations on campus are relatively simple, and once you make a mistake, it is easy to cause a devastating blow to your reputation. Therefore, even those people with low quality will restrain their behavior on campus, but in society, they will show the clues.
Poor quality cannot be changed through higher education. Self-education and self-learning ability are important criteria for a person's long-term development. People who can enter higher education may have very strong self-study ability, but if the quality is low, it means that the self-study ability is very poor. Even if these people do the low-quality behavior they once knew, they will not be ashamed and correct their behavior. But when people grow up, it is impossible for teachers to educate themselves all the time, so the problem lies with themselves.
In short, there should be no academic discrimination and no color labels. Seeing that others think that people who receive higher education are of good quality, we still have to look at real behavior and conduct, and don't be confused by external camouflage.