The reason why the security guard did this may be that he thought he had the right to tell the vendors in the school what to do. He may think that he can decide whether the security guard stays or not, so he does whatever he wants with the stall owner in the school because he is the security guard in the school. Perhaps the stall owners are also very helpless about this.

Recently, a security guard at Guangzhou Ocean University forcibly picked the fruit of the shopkeeper, which triggered a heated discussion and extensive discussion. Everyone said they didn't understand the behavior of the security guards. Because as you can see from the video, a security car is parked in the middle of the road with stall owners on both sides, and then the security guard naturally picks up the fruit of the fruit stall owner and loads it into the car, conveniently taking two fruits into his pocket. This behavior can be said to be very natural. This series of processes makes people feel that this fruit stall is his own, and it is obvious that the fruit stall owner is also helpless. Everyone doesn't quite understand why the security guard put two fruits in his pocket and moved them to the car. Understandably, he probably didn't want the fruit vendor to set up a stall at school, but he naturally put two fruits in his pocket. This behavior is really puzzling. The fruit stand is not his. How can he be so free? It's really confusing. Judging from his actions, he should do it often.

The security guard thinks he has the right to dominate these stall owners because he thinks he is the security guard of the school. Maybe he put his identity too high, so he can be unscrupulous in front of these stall owners, as if the whole school street is his. There seems to be a feeling of robbery. This security guard's practice is really incorrect. The school has investigated the matter. I think this security guard should realize his mistake.