The advantages of all elective courses in colleges and universities outweigh the disadvantages. There should be about three arguments, so I won't repeat them. It's urgent. Asking questions at 6 o'clock tomorrow evening is invalid. 1, the credit system destroys the integrity of the discipline. When everyone enters a university, he can only complete some aspects of study, not a subject. It is not necessary to learn all of them, so where do you start to undermine integrity? 2. The credit system will cause a waste of teaching resources. It just means that there are teachers who have no classes, but it can reflect the level of lecturers. 3. The credit system will break the chain of subject learning. With LS 4, the credit system will cause some students to study blindly. Even if the credit system is not implemented, it is blind. This can only be corrected through school guidance. The credit system will destroy the atmosphere of diligent study. The credit system requires students to get enough scores so that energetic students can choose other subjects, so it is not easy for ordinary students to learn compulsory subjects well. This is to promote diligence, not to damage the credit system. 6. The operation is difficult, and there are some loopholes in the management of student status. A software system, the school teacher can do it in half a month. 7. Students have no concept of "class" and lose some valuable classmates' friendship and campus atmosphere. Is there no class in the credit system? 8. Students' ideological work is difficult. Ideological work can only be done through propaganda. Even if there is no credit system, students' thinking is still the same, not to mention it is difficult to achieve ... The other debater may ask: 1, and the credit system destroys the integrity of the subject. 2. The credit system will cause a waste of teaching resources. 3. The credit system will break the chain of subject learning. 4. The credit system will cause some students to study blindly. The credit system will destroy the atmosphere of diligent study. 6. The operation of the credit system is difficult, and there are some loopholes in the management of student status. 7. Students don't have the concept of "class" and lose some valuable classmates' friendship and campus atmosphere. 8. Students' ideological work is difficult. 1. Does it destroy the integrity of the subject? There are compulsory courses and elective courses. 2. What resources are wasted? Let interested students give full play to their interests, which is a more rational use of resources. 3. The current credit system is to control the credit system, and only after completing some subjects can you take half other subjects. 4. Compulsory courses and elective courses. . . 5. Why? 6, it is not difficult, just write a program. . 7. The concept of class still exists. . Credits and classes don't conflict, do they? . . . . Does it matter? Counterparty: It is not the general trend that the disadvantages of the credit system outweigh the advantages. Harvard University, the founder of the credit system, abolished the credit system in 1986, and many universities, including world-class universities, did not implement the credit system. The credit system is a teaching management system based on course selection and measuring students' academic completion with credits as the unit of measurement. Although the credit system is now advertised by most people as the sunshine avenue of education in China, from the standard, the implementation of the credit system does more harm than good. First, the implementation of the credit system is not conducive to achieving the fundamental goal of education. The three most important functions of education are cultural transmission, developing science and cultivating talents, while the credit system pays too much attention to individual knowledge needs. Students entering school is like entering a supermarket. They can choose whatever they want, as long as they get enough places. It seems free, but it ignores the transmission of culture and the foundation of educating people. Moreover, the credit system quantifies priceless knowledge and measures it by scores, which devalues the value of knowledge. Needless to say, the academic level of each school and teacher is uneven, and the judgment standards are not uniform at all. Second, the implementation of the credit system is not suitable for students' individual development. With freedom of choice in all aspects, there may not be all-round development. The credit system is easy to train students to attend classes only by interest, have knowledge but are not proficient, and ignore basic knowledge. Moreover, many students choose courses just to get credits, and only choose some courses that are easy to get credits. Third, the implementation of the credit system is not suitable for the current situation in China. At present, our country is implementing universal education, but the credit system is specially established for everyone. It needs certain conditions for running a school, enough high-level teachers, a convenient and flexible educational administration system and a developed campus network, as well as a high-quality management team and the high consciousness of all students. The credit system has its advantages, but its implementation is not suitable for students' individual development, educational purposes and China's national conditions. Two. 1) Pro: ... Since the other debater does not recognize the credit system, can you name a more perfect system than the credit system? I: It is precisely because there is no better system that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages at present that we have to reluctantly implement this system that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. Shouldn't we expose the disadvantages of the credit system in reality? The night gave me black eyes, but I used them to find light! A few minutes later ... Leon: You can't think of a better system. Why not admit that the advantages of the credit system outweigh the disadvantages? Me: I think I have answered this question clearly just now. Does the other debater still want to hear my generation from Gu Cheng? 2) Pro: ... You can't oppose the credit system just because of the disadvantages of the current education system. It is the advanced credit system that makes us see the disadvantages of the current education system and social system. We should change these backward systems instead of the advanced credit system! Myself (exaggerated tone): Oh, my God, the other debater! You want to change the social system just for a credit system? ! It is hard to say that the advantages of the credit system outweigh the disadvantages. 3) Me: I want to ask my opponent a simple question. When did the credit system first appear? The other side looked at the other side, was silent for a while, and then stood up: I can tell the other side that the debater is from Harvard University in the United States ... (I am talking about the origin of foreign credit system) Me (with a smile on my face, twice the speed of speech and a gentle tone): I think the other side debater "may" not hear my question clearly, so I'll ask you again, China, where was the credit system for the first time? The other party (angry): I don't know. But this does not affect our debate today. Myself (still laughing): The other debater doesn't even know when the credit system first appeared in China. No wonder he is so blindly optimistic about it! The other party is extremely green. In favor: More than 80% colleges and universities in China have implemented the credit system, which has achieved remarkable results. Although 80% of colleges and universities in China have implemented the credit system, most schools do not have the ability to implement the credit system, such as imperfect teaching management system, weak teachers, lack of strong attendance system, etc ... Advantages and disadvantages of the credit system 1, what is the credit system 2, and why should it be implemented? 3. Is the implementation of the credit system conducive to the development of students? Cultivate students' ability? Is it beneficial to the management and development of the school, and what is the impact on it? These influences are good or bad ... 4. Judge whether the purpose of implementing the credit system has been achieved? To what extent, what needs to be improved, etc ... Debate 1869 Harvard University also has a course selection system, which allows students to choose courses without plans, breaking the unified planning teaching model and broadening students' knowledge. However, 20 years after the elective system was implemented in Harvard University, the credit system began to be implemented, stipulating that students only need to reach a certain number of credits to graduate and obtain a degree. After Harvard, most colleges and universities in the United States have carried out reforms and implemented the course selection system and credit system. At first, there were many disadvantages due to the implementation of the credit system of completely free course selection. Many students do not consider forming a reasonable knowledge structure, but choose courses according to whether it is easy to get credits and whether the class time is convenient. Many students have no clear goals and the courses are fragmented. Without the center, the teaching staff, teaching equipment and modern management level of many universities are not high, so it is difficult to offer a large number of elective courses, choose courses through computers and implement a complete credit system. Therefore, the implementation of the credit system should be gradual, not across the board. At present, the most important thing is to strengthen the construction of teaching staff, improve the level of teachers, and offer a large number of courses to create conditions for students to choose courses. Elective courses are offered on the basis of the academic year system, and then the academic year credit system is implemented, and the complete credit system is implemented when conditions are ripe. However, the credit system is not the only teaching management system. When everything is not mature, there is no need to enforce the credit system, and there is no need for some special schools to enforce the credit system. The academic year system should be maintained as long as the curriculum structure and teaching content are scientific and reasonable. Under the current situation, the credit system in colleges and universities does more harm than good. Of course, we have to admit that the credit system does have its advantages, but it is far from covering up its shortcomings. As far as China's current national conditions are concerned, the credit system still has great disadvantages: first of all, the credit system was introduced from the west, and the western countries implemented the course selection system before the credit system, while China has been implementing the academic year system. This change alone makes it difficult for most people in China to adapt to the ideological situation; Secondly, the state advocates teaching students in accordance with their aptitude, and the implementation of the credit system can also allow students to choose their favorite subjects according to their hobbies and specialties. But it is precisely because of this that most students blindly choose subjects, and the hotter the major, the colder it is, and the importance is not important, which makes the quality talents of unpopular majors less and less; At the same time, although 80% of colleges and universities in China have implemented the credit system, most colleges and universities do not have the ability to implement the credit system, such as imperfect teaching management system, weak teachers, and lack of a strong attendance system, which greatly increases the difficulty of implementing the credit system in China. It is suggested that the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the credit system should be placed on the influence on teaching effect, pointing out that it is actually "the abnormal teaching progress caused by market demand shocks". Don't boil it down to "pros and cons of personal development", so narrowing the extension is good for you. As usual, when we say "implementing the credit system", we must stand on the basis of "school education achievements". You know, if we only consider the market demand of students, the school will have graduated a year ago, and adapting to the market is by no means the original intention of "learning". "Will students get better grades if they choose courses according to their hobbies?" If he dares to say that, he is dead! Does that mean that "students will definitely get better grades if they study according to their hobbies?" Does it mean that "students will get better grades if they go to school according to their hobbies?" Does it mean that "people will have better results if they do things according to their own hobbies?" This is ridiculous. Some students choose courses that are easy to get credits, which leads to the fragmentation of knowledge and destroys the systematicness and integrity of knowledge structure. Teaching activities are scattered, class integrity is weakened, and students' collectivism concept is diluted; In terms of obtaining credits, the benefits of "passing" and "excellent" are the same, which leads some students to be satisfied with "600 thousand live, 70 waste"; Some teachers are afraid that their classes will be left out, relax their requirements, relax their management, and even give them away. Some of these problems and negative effects are inherent in the academic scoring system itself, and some are brought about by the implementation process. When the credit system was implemented in the early years in the United States, there was a problem that "the knowledge learned by students was fragmented and the weight of students was not important". To this end, the education sector has thought a lot of countermeasures, such as determining compulsory majors, distinguishing advanced courses from post-graduate courses, and implementing curriculum groups. Similar problems occurred in the implementation of the credit system in the old China University, which was questioned by people of insight. For example, Liu Boming, deputy director of the Standing Committee of Southeast University (predecessor of Nanjing University), once admired the credit system, but advocated its abolition a few years later. He believes that "those who choose elective courses under the credit system only need to choose the closest one." And human nature is easier to take refuge in, the benefits are infinite, that is, the disadvantages of willfulness can be seen everywhere [4]. He suggested that "the first two years of college courses can allow students to study general subjects." At the end of the second year, each student must determine a major. ..... Those who pass the examination and approval are allowed to study freely without being punished by credits; It is up to him whether he will go to class or not. At the end of the second year, if you want to get a degree, you will imitate the German university system and conduct very strict examinations; Or use other methods to review your academic performance. If you do have experience within two years, you will be awarded a degree "[4]. In the process of implementing the credit system in Guangzhou Shipai University, in view of the possible problems, the relationship between the all-round development of morality, intelligence, physique and aesthetics is carefully handled, the personnel training standards and individualized teaching are ensured, and the teaching is planned and flexible, and the teaching is invigorated and the management is strict, which has achieved good results. [5] It can be seen that it is both necessary and possible to promote advantages and eliminate disadvantages and prevent and overcome the negative effects of the credit system. ! First of all, after the implementation of the credit system, the biggest practical problem is whether the course selection resources, teacher resources and various software and hardware conditions of the school can be shared and sufficient. The problem of teachers, in particular, will become the most difficult and headache problem in implementing the credit system. If there are not enough teachers behind it, the implementation of the credit system will become empty talk. Even if it is barely implemented, it is impossible to fully meet the students' demand for course selection, and the quality of education and teaching cannot be guaranteed. Secondly, with the implementation of the credit system, the traditional natural classes, majors and grades will be broken or even disappeared, and replaced by a large number of "professional classes" and "course classes". In this case, the difficulty of education management will greatly increase. The biggest possibility is that the tutorial system will replace the current class teacher system. Thirdly, after the course selection system is implemented, the time and space for students to control themselves will be greatly increased. How to make full use of the "advantages" of students' spare time and space, strengthen the education management of college students, expand their comprehensive quality and improve their humanistic level has become a major issue for schools, student staff, teaching administrators and all teachers. Fourth, with the implementation of the credit system, students' study years will change greatly, and the original fixed study years limit will be broken. Diplomas and degree certificates will no longer be issued once a year, but many times a year, which will greatly increase the difficulty of student status management. Fifth, with the implementation of the credit system, payment will become a major issue in education management. Paying tuition according to credits will replace the current academic year system. Sixth, the implementation of the credit system is conducive to college students' self-employment and the reform of employment system and mode, but it brings great difficulties to graduates' employment guidance and centralized education management. China's higher education has developed from elite education to mass education, the national economic system has developed from planned economy to market economy, and science and technology have advanced by leaps and bounds. People's ideas, values, legal concepts, moral concepts and employment concepts have all undergone tremendous changes, which will inevitably affect college students' ideas and values. In addition, the number of only children, children from single-parent families and children from economically disadvantaged families is increasing, and college students' awareness of personal independence and law is increasing, which brings more and more difficulties and severe challenges to college students' education management.