It's really bold and harmful to society. Two naughty middle school students set fire to the corridor of the residential area, which did not cause great disaster in time. But is it because it only criticizes the educated minors?

? At 6 o'clock in the afternoon on June 2 1 day, two boys aged 13 came in the elevator room of a residential area in Beijing. One of them poured a liquid suspected of alcohol, gasoline or alcohol into the joint of the pipeline and lit the liquid with a lighter in his hand. Then he poured the liquid from a height many times to help burn. As more and more liquid falls, the flame drops to the ground with the liquid. After seeing the fire, the two boys did not put out the fire, but actually left by elevator.

Subsequently, the fire was put out after being discovered by residents, but fortunately it did not cause great losses. The police who received the alarm only criticized and educated the two minors who set fire. No other punishment measures were taken.

@ Looking at Bashu coldly: It is true that according to the current regulations, these two junior high school boys are minors, and they can all get the right to be exempted from punishment according to law. But at present, juvenile delinquency is becoming more and more frequent, and the maturity of teenagers is much earlier than when this regulation was formulated decades ago. It can be said that 13-year-old boy's body and mind are not lower than that of 16-year-old boy 30 years ago. Is it really appropriate for us to stick to the rules and let such teenagers commit crimes? In the video, two arsonists aged 13 are at least about 1.7 in height. Don't they really know what their actions are? Since ancient times, killing and setting fire has been a great evil. How can you describe it as "little evil"? Must the whole building be set on fire?

I think how can such a bad surname criticize education casually? Even if administrative detention is not possible, how many hours of community service they need to participate in and work for the community with their own practical actions can they really improve. Originally, the child's behavior was related to the poor education of parents. As a result, they only criticized education and finished it. There is really suspicion of shielding and conniving! This is not for them, but for them!

"Don't do it because it's small, and don't do it because it's small." It seems that children nowadays have never received such education!