Paragraph 2 of Article 5: Parents or other guardians of school-age children and adolescents shall ensure that they enter school on time to receive and complete compulsory education according to law.
Article 58 If parents or other legal guardians of school-age children and adolescents fail to send them to compulsory education in accordance with the provisions of this Law without justifiable reasons, the education administrative department of the local township people's government or the people's government at the county level shall give criticism and education and order them to make corrections within a time limit.
Small international students do not accept domestic compulsory education.
What are these parents up to? China has implemented nine-year compulsory education for a long time, and it is compulsory education. Forget the kids. Let's just say that as parents, children only go to primary school, so you send your children abroad to receive basic education abroad. Is this appropriate?
It is conditional for foreign countries to accept small international students.
Compulsory education for school-age children in China is free, but if you go abroad, you must pay tuition.
It is not unconditional to accept primary and secondary school students abroad. Let's see how much they have paid. Domestic compulsory education is free, why should parents send it abroad? Most parents are not short of money, so they send their children abroad for education (at a certain fee).
Become a left-behind child in a foreign country
Since these parents are willing to send such a small child abroad as a left-behind child, it proves that their parents all think that the education in the motherland is not good, so how about educating their children to be patriotic! I'm sure these parents are preparing for immigration (personal opinion)
Will these young international students come from China in the future?
The purpose of sending them abroad since childhood is to train foreigners in the future. How many of them can come back to serve the motherland after passing the qualification? We can't count on them for the future construction of the motherland, but we should pay more attention to the children in China. This is the future of the motherland.
There is one condition for joining British nationality: legal residence in Britain 10 years or more; Therefore, some parents send their children to study in Britain from an early age, so that ten years later, their children will naturally have British citizenship.
Parents who send their children abroad to study at an early age no longer recognize their nationality in essence. As we all know, the basic education in China is the best in the world, from primary school to high school. If you can't get the best education, can children who come back from abroad for western education be patriotic? Parents are unpatriotic. Do you expect those children to be patriotic?
It is the responsibility and obligation of China people to receive compulsory education.
Viewpoint 1:
Receiving nine-year compulsory education is both a right and an obligation. It is illegal for People's Republic of China (PRC) citizens not to receive nine-year compulsory education, so such parents should be severely punished. If these young international students don't change their nationality, then the parents' actions violate the compulsory education law.
Viewpoint 2:
Parents send their children abroad in order to join foreign nationality in the future in order to develop abroad. How can a future China person and a future foreigner break the laws of China?
I think it is illegal not to abide by the national education law. Will these children who have gone abroad since childhood love China when they grow up (this will probably happen after they become foreign nationals)? Will it contribute to the construction and development of China? They have never received this kind of education (patriotic education) since childhood, but have received western education (personal interests first, that is, human rights and freedom). Therefore, it is impossible for them to grow up and return to China.
The child is innocent and the responsibility lies with the parents. And the state should also impose more restrictions on this situation. Minors do not receive formal education from the state, but those who go abroad for western education should be punished by law. In this way, such things will be less. This is a major event related to the future development of the country and should not be underestimated. Otherwise, with the prosperity of the country, there are more and more rich people, and there will be more and more things for children to study abroad since childhood.
If parents send their children abroad to study in order to settle abroad and become foreigners in the future, I think the compulsory education law can no longer restrain these parents. Finally, I hope that those children who have studied abroad can come back to contribute to the country after they have achieved something. The motherland needs you!
These young international students, they don't receive compulsory education in China. What are their parents doing? Let's talk together!
Without nine-year compulsory education, it can be said that these dolls are useless to China in the future. First of all, they don't know patriotism. What's the use of an unpatriotic person?
They don't recognize the education in China! Do not recognize China culture! This country recognizes nothing! Do you think this is illegal? !
It is illegal for primary school students to study abroad. Because compulsory education has a very important educational content, patriotism education, will foreign countries educate these students to love China? No, never. Without patriotism education in compulsory education, the post-80s, post-90s and post-00s would not have made such a regretless contribution to the country and people, and even sacrificed their lives in this anti-COVID-19 movement.
This question has been questioned for a long time and discussed with relevant legal professionals. When I was writing an article some time ago, I also mentioned that it would be discussed in detail.
Recently, the incident of 6.5438+0.5 million underage students studying in Britain returned to China triggered a huge public opinion tear, leading to radish mud. In the school year, whether it is illegal for children (teenagers) to study abroad from an early age and not accept nine-year compulsory education has once again aroused public concern.
Here from the legal provisions and jurisprudence two angles.
First, from the perspective of legal provisions, there is no clear provision.
"Is it illegal for children to study abroad since childhood and not receive nine-year compulsory education in China?" As we all know, the "law" here refers to the Compulsory Education Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) (PRC).
Let's look at the provisions of the law reform:
It is said here that "the state implements a nine-year compulsory education system", and later it is said that "compulsory education is an education that all school-age children and adolescents must receive under the unified implementation of the state".
Please note that it means "all school-age children and adolescents must receive" compulsory education. Then, do school-age children and adolescents receive compulsory education when studying abroad?
In fact, most countries have a compulsory education system, and some developed countries in Europe and America implemented the compulsory education system earlier than China. For example, the "K 12 academic system" in the United States is compulsory education, which is equivalent to grade one to grade three. Old capitalist Britain is the first country in the world to implement compulsory education. 1880 was implemented for 7 years at the age of 5- 12 years. 1988 compulsory education reform, the implementation of 12 years old compulsory education system.
Well, here comes the question: the law stipulates that "all school-age children and adolescents must receive compulsory education", but it does not stipulate that they must receive compulsory education at home-who can join the foreign compulsory education system?
Some people may say, isn't this a loophole?
Please note that the real thinking of the rule of law is that the law can be done without prohibition. Therefore, our society has been implementing two governance methods: rule by virtue and rule by law!
Second, from a legal point of view, it is definitely illegal.
As mentioned above, the law does not explicitly stipulate that it is illegal not to send minors (school-age children and teenagers) abroad for compulsory education, but in fact, no matter how good the law is, we cannot consider all the present and future situations without omission.
There is a simple reason. /kloc-What will happen in 0/0 years? /kloc-What will happen in 0/00 years?
Therefore, the rule of law will always have a certain lag.
But the jurisprudence is basically fixed.
As mentioned above, the legal provisions only stipulate compulsory education, not compulsory education in China. But from a legal point of view, this provision is actually very obvious.
Do not believe, let's take a look at Article 3 of the Compulsory Education Law:
"Implementing the national education policy" and "cultivating socialist builders and successors with ideals, morality, education and discipline"-isn't this compulsory education in China?
Is compulsory education in the United States training "socialist builders and successors"? Unless they are cultivating grave diggers for themselves?
From this perspective, all school-age children and adolescents who do not follow the national education policy must have violated the Compulsory Education Law!
Therefore, it is suggested that the Ministry of Education and local education departments study and publicize the Compulsory Education Law repeatedly, and strengthen the enforcement of the Compulsory Education Law to avoid the situation that a large number of minors go abroad to receive compulsory education and eventually become foreigners!
On this issue, some netizens questioned it a few days ago.
The questioning netizen objected to taking 1.5 million small international students back to China, because he said that these small international students went abroad to study in primary schools, which in itself violated the compulsory education law.
In order to answer this question, the author specifically inquired about the Compulsory Education Law and found several clauses:
According to the interpretation of the compulsory education law, the behavior of these small international students does violate these terms!
Analysis:
? Compulsory education, including primary school and junior high school, is compulsory education for China citizens. Pupils studying in primary schools and junior high schools abroad obviously have not received compulsory education at home.
? According to national regulations, all citizens in China must fulfill their obligation to receive compulsory education. Note that finishing primary school and junior high school in China is an obligation that must be fulfilled.
? Parents and guardians of children must ensure that their children complete compulsory education and study in China.
? Some people may feel wronged. Studying in primary school and junior high school in China is nothing more than studying culture, and studying culture abroad has the same effect.
I emphasize here: the effect is really different!
I would like to ask: Do children studying abroad receive the same moral education and textbooks as those used in China?
This is also the crux of the problem.
Family education is to cultivate children to establish a correct outlook on life, values and world outlook, and let them know what to do and what not to do.
China's ideological field is very strict, and the purpose of education in China is to cultivate talents who are useful to national construction and people. Who are you training for when you send your children abroad? Who is it for?
visual angle
In recent years, parents have higher and higher expectations for their children, and going abroad to study in primary schools has become the choice of more and more families.
Studying abroad has become younger. In order to meet the needs of parents, various institutions are also busy with the matchmaking of studying abroad. It seems that no one is interested in whether young international students studying abroad violate the compulsory education law.
The training institution said: only help parents send their children abroad, regardless of whether there are legal problems. If there is, it is also faced by parents.
The local education department believes that studying abroad at a young age is a new thing. At present, the education administrative department basically acquiesced and did not intervene. Whether it violates the compulsory education law and how to carry out legal supervision are worthy of attention and discussion in the legal field.
In my opinion, there is no need to worship foreign things and flatter foreign countries in the basic education stage. Children's childhood is a critical period for the formation of world outlook, values and outlook on life, and the integration of China elements into the blood. Going out too early will lead to a lack of culture, which is not conducive to long-term development.
It is illegal for children to go abroad for foreign education since childhood.
I'm Lang Yue Cecilia Han. Welcome to pay attention and talk about education together.
I think it is illegal for children to study abroad since childhood and not accept nine-year compulsory education in China, but there are certain special circumstances.
First, the provisions of the compulsory education law.
Article 2 of China's Compulsory Education Law stipulates:
Article 4 requires that school-age children and adolescents with China nationality not only enjoy equal rights to receive compulsory education, but also fulfill their obligations to receive compulsory education.
These two articles have clearly defined the education that school-age children and adolescents must receive.
Second, it depends on whether small international students violate the law.
However, there are no clear regulations in various education departments. Most of the students who used to study abroad were high school students and college students. In recent years, the study abroad program has begun to extend to primary and secondary school students, and it has become more and more serious.
Because, in everyone's ideology, children's education is equivalent to compulsory education. It seems to be consistent with the goal and direction of our compulsory education to prevent children studying abroad from becoming illiterate or even becoming world-class talents. Therefore, some experts have also raised the controversial topic of whether compulsory education should respect the right to choose.
The problem of small international students has not appeared in public view, but I don't think it is good to send children out to study. Every family has its own choice. I used to agree with this idea, thinking that parents can let their children study abroad and accept it.
Because, I also feel that school education lacks certain flexibility for children, even in the education of Chinese studies, and it is still lacking, and it is impossible for children to understand the true moral cultivation. However, a document published in April, 2065438+2009 made me change the original family-based full-time education of Chinese studies, thinking and body, and adopted the way of combining these methods with the overall education system in China. National education as the leading factor, supplemented by family education, to promote the all-round development of children's morality, intelligence and physique.
In the first of these provisions:
Off-campus training institutions cannot carry out full-time training, and the corresponding full-time education for families is somewhat similar, which does not belong to the business scope approved by the education administrative department and registered by the market supervision department.
There is also a vague classification, although family behavior belongs to non-market behavior and does not need to be registered by the market supervision department; However, if families want to implement the content of alternative compulsory education, they must always accept the approval of the education authorities, which is reasonable and feasible.
Therefore, I think that it is not allowed to replace compulsory education with family education without the implementation of the education authorities, and it should be banned.
From this logical thinking, it is ok to participate in foreign education since childhood, but it needs the permission of the domestic education authorities. There is no illegal behavior for small international students who go abroad if they are allowed by the education authorities, otherwise there is illegal behavior.
Concluding remarks
Generally speaking, it is against the relevant laws to send children abroad to study at an early age, but if allowed, it is not illegal and needs the approval of relevant departments.
Children go abroad to study and receive foreign education since childhood. Is it illegal for them not to receive nine-year compulsory education in China? To answer this question, we should start with the Compulsory Education Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) (PRC).
Article 4 of the General Provisions of Chapter I of the Compulsory Education Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) clearly stipulates that all school-age children and adolescents with People's Republic of China (PRC) nationality are regardless of gender, nationality, race, family property status, religious beliefs, etc. Enjoy the equal right to receive compulsory education and fulfill the obligation to receive compulsory education according to law.
As long as children have People's Republic of China (PRC) nationality, they enjoy equal rights to receive compulsory education and fulfill their obligations to receive compulsory education according to law. If children study abroad, as long as their nationality has not changed, they must abide by the Compulsory Education Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) (PRC). Will foreign primary and junior high school education be recognized in China? This is not a question that we can answer. From the interpretation of the Compulsory Education Law alone, it is illegal for a child not to accept the Nine-year Compulsory Education Law of People's Republic of China (PRC).
Children are the flowers of the motherland, the backbone of the nation and the future of society. China's children are educated abroad, and their outlook on life, values and world outlook may not be suitable for China's national conditions. We are training successors for Socialism with Chinese characteristics's modernization. If the children who come back from studying abroad have made contributions to the motherland, then such children are exactly what society needs.
The law is definitely illegal, but children who go abroad are rich. Who will enforce the law?
Every day, I am struggling to pick up small international students and pick them up! Parents can take care of them, isolate them on the spot, and they can't keep up with the manpower and material resources when they return to China, which is a risk of infection. The country should listen to the voice of the people this time!