First of all, giving extra points to the children of epidemic prevention personnel is not conducive to the fairness of the college entrance examination.
College entrance examination is the fairest way to select talents in China. No matter whether you have money or not, candidates speak according to their scores, and no one will object. This is an excellent opportunity for children from poor families. However, giving children extra points in epidemic prevention and medical care undermines this fairness and seriously affects the interests of other college entrance examination students.
Medical staff can get material or spiritual rewards. The purpose of the college entrance examination is to let all students in China compete in a relatively fair environment. If you say that your study conditions are poor and the environment in remote areas is poor, it is ok to add points appropriately. I believe this has been recognized by the people of the whole country. However, most countries support medical personnel from relatively developed regions and cities, who have rich educational resources. If you get extra points, how can children in mountainous rural areas or areas with poor educational resources compete? I believe that the dedication and sacrifice of medical staff is undeniable. Even if it really gives extra points to the children of medical staff, there will not be too many complaints in the country. After all, the contribution of medical care is a fact. However, the legal rationality is somewhat unreasonable, and this proposal does not show relative fairness and justice.
First-line epidemic prevention medical staff work hard, but there are many reward methods. The way to give children extra points in the college entrance examination is unfair to educational resources and other candidates, and the unfairness of education is the biggest unfairness.
Adding points to one candidate is equivalent to dropping points to other candidates. What mistakes did these children make? Because their parents are not doctors and nurses? Or is it not a contribution for a doctor to stay where he is, stick to his post and not take the lead in epidemic prevention? In addition, many people make different contributions in different jobs.