It can be said that this "dot matrix pen" used in teaching scenes is like the "electronic equipment handcuffs and shackles" locked by schools and teachers for children. If it is really implemented on a large scale, it is likely that children will not have the freedom to catch up on homework or grind homework.
However, it is this "dot matrix" computer pen that middle school teachers use for class students. Although it is free, it is still necessary to pay compensation according to the price after being destroyed. In a sense, it really enhances the psychological pressure of students and the economic burden of parents. In fact, ordinary senior high school students are in the adolescence stage with extremely sensitive mentality and temperament. Basically, all severe measures from parents and teachers will have a strong response in children's hearts.
After all, junior high school students are so knowledgeable. What they see in their eyes and can think of in their minds, except teachers and classmates, is to brush the exam. It is a rare relaxation and happiness for children, but the rest time and pressure release after class and holiday. Now teachers want to cooperate with parents to think about their children's rest days and make suggestions. Actually, it is a heartless teaching.
In fact, whether asking parents to sign their children's homework or move, asking children to punish their children, running laps or asking parents are just ways to urge and force junior and senior high school students to study hard.
Theoretically speaking, it is a further "competition" for children's learning situation and emotional psychology: students' rest days are cut according to occupation and laser, so as to achieve the practical effect of guiding students to score in a short time and with high efficiency. However, helpless behavior is usually "inexorable". At best, it can only be regarded as urging and prolonging children's workload, but it is unlikely that children will continue to change and improve their learning attitude and attitude under the passive learning rhythm.
Therefore, if some parents and teachers think that using surveillance cameras on children's heads or pens can allow adults to monitor students' study time and work efficiency at any time, and children's test scores can be greatly improved, it is wrong. Because mental activities like learning and training need thinking and reason more than being forced and uneasy. I think at this point, the personal experiences of adults and children are actually the same.
In terms of learning, many parents and teachers will think that children's learning and training can be improved because we continue to lengthen students' learning time and increase their learning pressure, which is self-evident. Therefore, before the "double reduction policy", many parents would pay high prices for their children to enroll in remedial classes in various subjects out of the mentality of "for the good of their children", hoping that by investing "extra teaching resources", their children would get much higher development than those around them.
But in fact, if you really want your children to accept that "learning is the basic task of students", then actively and sincerely study, study and train. Its fundamental point is to give children enough time to explore and feel indoor space in life and study, and give them more confidence and recognition of living alone. They don't want to treat their children as children, they hate not staring at their own learning, and even try to bring students' learning process and homework into the scope of blind comparison, comparison and reference based on high-tech equipment such as surveillance cameras and dot-matrix pens.
There is no doubt that it will give children a "head-on blow" from the psychological and emotional aspects, so it will continue to destroy the parent-child interaction and the emotional connection between teachers and students.
For this matter, some experts pointed out that the application of smart pen and paper should also "teach students in accordance with their aptitude", so as not to bring convenience to the teacher's classroom, which will lead to the conflict of some students, and even involve many problems such as cultural and educational ethics and invasion of privacy.
Obviously, this teaching method cannot be called "success". Moreover, within the scope of the law, this "dot matrix pen" with camera should also take very strict safeguard measures to ensure that the rights of children and parents will not be damaged under the premise of distorting and distorting the basic classroom order.
In short, middle school teachers actively use the latest scientific and technological machinery and equipment to innovate and try in teaching methods and processes, which is really worth encouraging. However, as the mainstream of cultural education, teachers need to innovate and change themselves, which means passing on the values of knowledge and skills to students and teachers, and making students more interested in driving learning. Instead of supervising and forcing children to learn by "breaking the old and creating the new", we should try to adopt a more naive, competitive and strict educational supervision method. Then such "innovative education" must be unsuccessful.