Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - What do you mean, Mo Xuyou?
What do you mean, Mo Xuyou?
The story of "unwarranted" comes from the biography of Yue Fei, the history of Song Dynasty. Yue Fei was arrested. When the case was about to open, Han Shizhong refused to accept it and asked Qin Gui to interrogate him. Qin Gui said that the reactionary letter written by Yue Fei's son Yue Yun to Zhang Xian was missing, but it was "unwarranted". Han Shizhong said: "Why does the word' unwarranted' prevail in the world?" This is the beginning of unnecessary attention.

Intellectuals in China read ancient books, wagging their heads and pretending to be knowledgeable. In fact, they can't read ancient books because they don't read well and read indiscriminately. Take the word "unwarranted" as an example. Everyone explains what "nothing" means, which doesn't make sense at all. If Qin Gui had the audacity to say "nothing" is "nothing", it would mean that Yue Fei was punished without evidence, which would mean that he openly admitted that he was fooling around. How can this happen in the world? China knowledge everyone reads Yue Fei Biography and History of Song Dynasty, but everyone doesn't delve into this explanation. What an asshole.

Finally one or two people dared to ask. In Zi Zhi Tong Jian, Xu said that the word "unnecessary" was wrong and should be "necessary". In the textual research of Zi Tong Zhi Jian, Bi Yuan used the circumstantial evidence at the end of Zhongxing Notes to think that it should also be "necessary". Zhu Yizun said it was right to do so. But what is the basis for changing the word "mo" to "must"? The words "Mo" and "Bi" are obviously different words! In view of this, I think that the word "unnecessary" in the Manuscript should be translated literally, the punctuation should be "mo, necessary", "mo" means hesitation, and "must have" is necessary. "Shi Zhong cut off his words and combined them to show his contempt for absurdity." Yu's explanation did not make the mistake of changing ancient books without permission, but it still didn't make sense.

In fact, the word "unwarranted" was used by people in the Song Dynasty. We should look for circumstantial evidence from people's books in Song Dynasty, which is the real way to solve the problem. In the book of the Song Dynasty, I found that there is a sentence in the Records of Jian Yan Years called "Don't call it the 23rd future"; There is an old saying in Xiao Qu, "Don't wait for me to tell you no"; There is a saying in "Talk about Tiewei Mountain": "Don't ask him if he is absent"; There is a saying in the book "Praise Bao Zheng's fasting method" that "don't argue with him"; There is a saying that "don't thank the ministers" in Classified Jane Yizhi; There is a saying that "there is no need to approve" in Siling Record; There is a saying in the complete works of Houcun University that "no one is needed". ..... From these spoken languages of the Song Dynasty, we can draw the conclusion that the semantic meaning of "Xu Mo" originally means "don't want you" or "don't want you". The word "unwarranted" turned out to be "isn't it?" The meaning of. Textual research on the original text of The History of Song Dynasty: "It is embarrassing that Han Shizhong is unfair to the prison. He said:' Fei Ziyun and Zhang are unknown, but their affairs are unnecessary.' In modern Chinese, it is obviously "Yue Fei's crime, isn't it?" Arrogant tone. This tone is a tit-for-tat dialogue at that time, and it makes sense to explain the word "unwarranted" in this way.