The development of smart government affairs is easy to fall into misunderstanding: it is oriented by engineering construction, and it is believed that simplifying examination and approval and accelerating the construction of a large number of information systems can better improve the government's ability to perform its duties. This project-oriented construction model can't highlight the key points and enhance the pertinence and effectiveness of smart government construction according to the main contradictions in the stage of economic and social development. At present, the construction of smart government affairs must adhere to the problem-oriented and establish a demand-oriented construction mechanism. Taking the demand for social management and public services as the goal, and effectively improving the government's ability to perform their duties as the starting point, we will rationally plan smart government construction projects, effectively improve the ability and level of social management and public services, and further improve the timeliness, standardization and authority of public services. ?

Second, from decentralized construction to intensive construction?

For a long time, the construction of smart government lacks top-level design, and the phenomenon of decentralization, low level and repeated investment is widespread. According to statistics, during the Twelfth Five-Year Plan period, the average proportion of departments with independent computer rooms in provincial and sub-provincial cities, prefectures and counties was 70%, 32% and 22% respectively. The proportion of decentralized construction of government websites at the provincial, prefectural, district and county levels is 78%, 32% and 30% respectively. The infrastructure construction of smart government is seriously dispersed, and the extensive construction mode has not been fundamentally curbed, which brings various difficulties to the interconnection of business systems, information sharing and business collaboration. Therefore, it is urgent to strengthen the overall coordination of planning, construction and operation of smart government, accelerate the transformation from extensive and inefficient decentralized construction to intensive and efficient coordinated development, and from independent construction and self-contained system of departments to cross-departmental and cross-regional business collaboration and information sharing. ?

Third, government dominance leads to social co-governance?

The "Decision" of the Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee proposed: to speed up the formation of a scientific and effective social governance system. The subjects participating in "governance" include all kinds of power departments, public departments, as well as all kinds of enterprises and social organizations. They are equal in the process of participating in state and social affairs. "Social governance" makes up for the limitation of the connotation of "social management" and enables the social governance system to innovate and expand. Smart government is the information reflection of social governance model, and the construction model of smart government should always adapt to and serve the change and evolution of social governance model. ?

1, standardize the social co-construction mechanism, and build a social co-governance model with the government leading as one body and the extensive participation of enterprises and society as two wings. ?

2, standardize the supervision and guarantee mechanism, regulate the rights, responsibilities and interests of participants. ?

3. Encourage the government to purchase services and make full use of social resources. Accelerate the formation of a unified and effective platform and mechanism for purchasing services, clarify the guiding catalogue of government purchasing services, clarify the types, nature and contents of government purchasing services, establish a relatively perfect system for government purchasing services, and accelerate the transformation from government-led to social co-governance. ?

Fourth, from data separation to data open sharing?

According to statistics, the government owns as much as 80% of the total social information resources, but the proportion of horizontal interaction between 80 private networks involved in 38 ministries and commissions surveyed by relevant departments is less than 0. 1%. This kind of data embarrassment depicts that the data barrier faced by government data sharing is getting bigger and bigger: the government business data is increasing by orders of magnitude, but there are huge differences in technical standards, development environment and system architecture of various business systems, which objectively creates technical barriers for government data Sharing Manufacturing. In the era of big data, it is necessary to completely eliminate the constraints of data sharing and business collaboration.

1, open data. It is necessary to plan the task book, timetable and roadmap of government data opening as soon as possible, and promote the institutionalization, standardization, proceduralization and legalization of data opening. ?

2. Implement the data sharing mechanism, clarify the rights, responsibilities and benefits of data sharing, and ensure the authenticity, vividness and authority of data according to the principle of "one number and one source". ?