Many people attack the unfairness of educational resources in China and envy the fairness of educational resources in Europe and America. But people who have been abroad will tell you that the educational resources in China are fair. In foreign countries, it is difficult for aristocratic schools and civilian children to enter.
Middle-class children are educated in middle-class schools, and ordinary children are never the same as those in these schools. So the gap will get bigger and bigger. But all children in China are enjoying nine-year compulsory education. This is also to find a relatively fair balance point in an absolutely unfair world.
A friend of mine is from the Institute of Chinese Studies. He advocates Chinese studies very much, and many parents send their children to the National Studies Institute to study classics instead of compulsory education. But is this really feasible? I have reservations. I believe that according to the ratio of 28 points, there will be some excellent children trained by national schools who will become the child prodigies sought after by people. However, can you be sure that your child can become 20% of these 20% and continue to be excellent?
Therefore, I may not take this risk to get my children out of the current education system. Another reason is that family education will play a greater role in children than school education, so I will pay more attention to the growth of parents in this respect and will not shirk these educational responsibilities that parents should bear to schools.
I believe that the children educated by parents with good family education concepts must be excellent children in any school education system.