In this incident, most netizens hold the view that when educators can't bring positive energy to students, how can they ask students to be full of positive energy? They believe that the "positive energy" advocated by the education department has become "politically correct hegemony". Let me talk about my personal thoughts on this matter.
0 1
All of us have basically received school education. We also came into contact with all kinds of teachers when we were students. Speaking of these teachers, we always think of various evaluation points: responsibility, professional ability, temper and character. And we unconsciously compared all the teachers we met, and made an opposite evaluation of "point". "Compared with teacher XXX, this teacher is really qualified" and "Compared with teacher XXX, this teacher's teaching ability should not be too strong" ............................................................................................................
Of course, there are a thousand Hamlets in the hearts of a thousand readers. Our comments on teachers all contain personal opinions, but many of them are subjective and cannot be mature and objective. Of course, some immature ideas may fade with people's growth and experience. As we grow older, we find that when we are young, we look at some problems from a one-sided perspective; The more I grow up, the more I find that many things have different views, and there is no right or wrong.
02
Just like this "Zhong Meimei Incident", the controversial video imitation basically revolves around the starting point of teachers criticizing students. Many netizens think that this boy's acting is very good, and his performance is very essence. At the same time, he also reminded everyone of his student days and said that he "had a strong sense of substitution." Among them, I personally think that many netizens are actually happy to express their feelings about their student days and youth.
However, the widespread spread of the video later attracted the attention of schools and education bureaus. According to the Education Bureau, "children should be guided from the front and take some positive energy works". This remark triggered a heated discussion among netizens.
Some netizens feel that this practice is overkill, and there are many emotional comments on the Internet accusing the school and the Education Bureau. So who spread the so-called "negative energy"
Students only imitate the teacher's words and deeds, and there are no other insulting hints. Video is "negative energy", why not reflect on yourself?
Is the teacher's cynical attitude in criticizing students worthy of praise? It is precisely because teachers are tired of coping with work and lack patience with students that they treat students in this negative way again and again. This teaching attitude has never been feasible. As educators, teachers' bounden duty is to teach and educate people. But many people sit on the teacher's chair, but they don't or don't guide the students to the correct three views. The common fault of many teachers now is that they have a sense of superiority. Even if you teach well, you can't educate people.
03
Just like many things in the world have their necessity. Education also needs art, and most students are obedient children. If some students make mistakes unintentionally, it is time to use language art to play a role.
While criticizing students, it not only makes them realize their mistakes, but also protects their dignity. Isn't the effect achieved by such education positive and effective? As teachers, they are faced with "children", a relatively weak group. Are teachers so willing to use them to show their superiority?
04
According to my personal experience, I have met teachers who gain the so-called "superiority" by belittling students and undermining their self-confidence. They tend to use negative language, such as "get out" and "what are you studying for?" . These teachers often raise their volume to attract students' attention and set up their own so-called "teachers".
As far as my personal experience is concerned, when I was in primary school, the teachers I met basically taught in this "style". To tell the truth, there were a lot fewer such teachers in junior high school and high school. But to be honest, in junior high school, I met the most scary math teacher. The teacher seems to treat everyone equally and has no discrimination in grades. In fact, he may not even recognize our classmates.
In his class, I seem to see what is real silence and what is real death. When it comes to PPT, he often says, "I can't do simple questions and difficult problems. Why come to school?" What school do you go to? "When I say these words, I like to compare our class with other classes." Look at Class X. I'm making such rapid progress in their class. What about yours? "
Different from ordinary teachers, this teacher seems to come into the classroom with resentment in class. When the progress of the lecture was slow, he simply sat on the bench, crossed his legs and knocked a stick on his leg casually, looking impatient. In this way, we experienced silence and lifelessness, and the classroom atmosphere dropped to freezing point.
Personally, I have never met a teacher who can bring the classroom atmosphere to such an embarrassing situation. If you give some advice to this teacher, you should be more patient and don't always bring personal emotions into teaching. At least have some respect for the profession and students.
If you are not interested in teaching, please find another job.
05
I admit, of course, there are very few such teachers, and most of them belong to relatively normal teachers. But macroscopically, I always feel that most people's education and teaching methods still have their own art, but they have never really been used. Today's education, it is time to change a mode of thinking. I know it's difficult, but I'll try to make some changes.
There is no denying that we can't completely affirm or deny anything. Opponents say that children are not as difficult to take care of as before, and they are becoming more and more unruly. You should be tough and show them some color. Even some teachers set up a "difficult" image for themselves before teaching. The teachers are very wronged. They are ordinary people, not saints. The teacher didn't come to suffer indignities. Teachers don't beat and scold easily, but because they are really angry, they lead to some extreme behaviors, and students hold a grudge, which further worsens the relationship between teachers and students. Therefore, there is a vicious circle of negative cognition in which teachers have a big temper and students are difficult to discipline. There is no denying that this prejudice will really hurt many excellent teachers by mistake.
As far as the evaluation of "negative energy" by its education department is concerned, it is essentially criticizing students for "not being able to speak well". Accustomed to satirizing students, teachers are not satisfied with students imitating teachers' satire. Is this a kind of bullying? Is it a conscious attack by the strong group on the weak group?
06
I think we can give an example that may not be appropriate. Black Americans have been crushed to death recently. Because blacks have been in a weak position for a long time in history, they have no right to speak and no strong leadership. Over time, people may discriminate against people with relatively weak capital and low social status, not skin color. Unfortunately, this is the case with blacks. In fact, Asians are also severely discriminated against. Many historical issues are complicated, and discriminatory ideas are hard to eliminate. For educators, it is also difficult to change the inherent mindset and adapt to and popularize the new educational model that may be more effective in education.
On the other hand, I hope to establish an equal relationship between educators and students. Positive energy comes from mutual respect. One of the two sides deliberately formed an unequal relationship, and the word "positive energy" gradually became a joke.
The emergence of interesting, healthy and positive classes requires mutual understanding, cooperation and common protection between you and me in society.