Do you want to learn olympiad? Do you learn olympiad logarithm well?
This paper discusses it from two aspects: quality education and exam-oriented education.
First of all, from the perspective of exam-oriented education, many parents study the Olympic Mathematics for a simple purpose, and choose schools for competition. In other words, if there is no competition, if you choose a school and don't take the exam, you will definitely not study. I study purely for utilitarian reasons. It can be said very responsibly that such parents account for at least 80% of students studying Olympic Mathematics.
For this kind of parents, whether it's Olympics or English, just take the exam, so study. What if you need to study calculus instead of taking the Olympic math exam? I believe many parents will not hesitate to give up olympiad and switch to calculus. As for whether calculus is too advanced, this question is beyond parents' consideration. Others can learn. Why can't our children learn? It doesn't matter how well they learn, but they can learn better than other children. Typical Tian Ji horse racing theory.
Then the first conclusion has come out. You need to take the exam. If you don't care about the exam, you don't have to study.
Although the competition has been cancelled now, the school explicitly forbids interviewing students to take the Olympic math test, but we all know the truth. We want to choose a school in junior high school and senior high school, and we want to pre-record the senior high school entrance examination, but we can't do this. Then don't think about this choice and do what we should do!
Then, from the perspective of quality education, do you want to learn Olympic Mathematics?
Let's look at the data. The Fields Medal, the highest prize in mathematics, is equivalent to the Nobel Prize in physical chemistry, which is more difficult to some extent because it stipulates that the winning age must be under 40.
Tao Zhexuan, the second winner from China, took part in the International Mathematical Olympiad at the age of 10, 165, 438+0 and 12, and won the bronze medal, silver medal and gold medal respectively. /kloc-Won the gold medal in the International Mathematical Olympiad before the age of 0/3. This is no accident. According to statistics, more than 60% of all Fields Medal winners and international Olympic gold medal winners, from Derifield, Goles and Lafarge to perelman and Tao Zhexuan, at least one Olympic gold medal winner has won a Fields Medal in almost every session! It has been about twenty years since they won the Olympic gold medal and the Fields Medal!
It can be seen that the Olympic Mathematics still plays a certain role in developing mathematical thinking. The most important thing is that these bosses are not studying Olympiad in our cram school. They don't remember formulas or models. They learn the Olympics from the perspective of understanding and develop their thinking. They really like math. None of them were hurt by the olympiad. On the contrary, Olympiad made these big men and finally won the Fields Medal.
So the conclusion is obvious.
If you want quality education, children can learn Olympic Mathematics if they can understand it, but they should learn it on the basis of understanding, not backrest formula, brushing questions and memorizing models. These are not helpful to the training of children's thinking ability and logical ability.
If you want to take the exam-oriented education, you must learn. Either way, as long as you get high marks, you can win.
On the whole, it is beneficial and harmless for children to learn olympiad on the basis of understanding when they have spare time to study. On the other hand, if you just want to take the exam, it can only be considered by parents in combination with their children's situation and their own goals.