The second category is some scum in education, who violate the law and discipline in order to satisfy their own selfish desires and greed; The impartial opinions or suggestions of educational experts exposed their shortcomings, and the crisis affected their vested interests. In order to vent their personal anger and seek revenge, they attacked educational experts at will.
The third category is a few real "front-line teachers", who unrealistically teach some fake education experts to express their dissatisfaction and vent their grievances. Some so-called education experts who are not grounded will only talk about other people's theories and accuse the current education and teachers. This is not and is not; The most typical is "happy education", and it is reasonable to be angered by front-line teachers.
First of all, those "spitters" and "sunspots" naturally know nothing about education. They are a group of unreasonable cynics. They don't know anything, just for their own self-interest. They try to become online celebrities and get rich by attacking others. They dare to "black" and "spray" everything. This kind of person is actually a group of social moths, which only harms education and teachers, and has no benefit!
Secondly, the scum in those teachers certainly don't really understand education. They were defiled by greed. "Don't talk in class, talk after class" and "collude with off-campus educational institutions and betray the interests of students and parents" are their "masterpieces" regardless of shame. They not only blackened the teachers' group, but also corrupted the educational order and atmosphere.
Moreover, among the real "front-line teachers", especially in primary and secondary schools, there are very few people who really understand education. Most front-line teachers just act as megaphones, and there are really few in-depth studies on current education and theoretical achievements; They criticize education experts for not knowing about education, and are more dissatisfied with the current educational bureaucracy, and dare not directly scold the educational administrative institutions. They just scold education experts without naming names, and their own interests are not lost.