At the beginning of the small step of early education at home, what struck me most was the early education concept of its founder, Ms. Peng-to accompany children at home with high quality, rather than throwing them to early education institutions. I think this idea is very good. It can not only effectively connect parents and children, but also better reflect the process of teaching and learning in family education. Secondly, talk about the course content and teaching materials. 1. Xiaobu's course materials: they are all open materials, and basically we use the things commonly used in our daily life (rice, noodles, water, pots and cans) as auxiliary materials and customized materials sent by the platform for teaching. Conceptually, these materials are really good, close to life, and can better inspire children. Unlike some institutions, the materials are ready, and children only need to assemble them mechanically or use them directly. However, it is still necessary to say that although the concept is good, the implementation will sometimes cause contradictions between adults and children. For example, some family information is only used in several ways, and no more gameplay has been developed, so it is relatively difficult to clean it up. For example, food coloring is difficult to wash. Not only do adults find it difficult to clean up, in fact, it is a trivial matter for adults to clean up the "battlefield" for their children after class. And after a long time, children are also very repulsive, and children who love cleanliness are not willing to use it.

There are also ingredients such as rice and millet, which can't be used after use. When children are young, they will throw them around at will, which is not conducive to educating children and saving food (this problem seems small, but I still feel wasteful in the process of using it myself. I wonder if other parents feel the same way). But on the whole, we use our own pots and pans and edible materials as teaching AIDS, and the concept is still very good, especially for many ordinary families, if they can't afford expensive early education equipment, then this small step course is really good and can be regarded as "green early education". In this process, we will also see that adults and children are exploring, which is full of fun for children and parents. Although some teaching AIDS are too small for children to experience personally, through the preparation of lessons by parents, he can learn how a simple daily material can become his own teaching aid. Over time, children can also get a lot of inspiration from middle school. I think this process is very delicate. 2. Small Steps In May and June this year, parent-child English classes were added to every course. From the original intention, this extra class is very good, especially for the people we bought before, who can watch the class without extra money. Moreover, there are not only teachers' careful guidance, but also foreign teachers' reading and post-reading grading, which are very good and step by step, so that parents and children can learn English. However, I still want to say "but", which is not suitable for enlightening baby's English, because many sentences in it are relatively difficult for children to accept. I have tried it many times, and once I use English, my children are very repulsive. Therefore, this course is suitable for parents, especially parents with poor English, and can make good use of these contents. Over time, in the process of accompanying children, parents will definitely learn English in by going up one flight of stairs. In the early months, I still recommended ultra-simple songs for children's English enlightenment, as well as picture books and cartoons suitable for children (I have accumulated a lot of information on English enlightenment in the process of accumulation for more than a year, and if necessary, Ma Baobao can leave me a message, which I can share with you for free, and I will get it for free, as long as it can help our children). Language learning is gradual and abstract, and we can't mechanically instill incomprehensible and complicated things into children. Instead, take your time and give your child some time. My child is now 1 8 months old and has just started to learn three to five words. I can't expect her to say all kinds of words and sentences used in class, but the words and phrases she learned from nursery rhymes and picture books surprised me very much. So I think in fact, if possible, Xiaobu can cooperate with other platforms and put in some classic English enlightenment materials, such as nursery rhymes, which will not only save parents from looking for those classic materials, but also strengthen their stickiness to the platform. Or the English songs recommended at the back of each theme course can be closer to the theme. I remember that the theme of the 23-week course was elephants, but the song recommended by Xiao Bu was rabbits. Although the course doesn't need to be mechanically linked, since the whole course is based on the theme, is it better to put the songs with the same theme together? (Of course, on the whole, the Xiaogang curriculum has also put corresponding nursery rhymes, but the quality is not classic. In particular, TPR courses are suitable for parents with more time, but not for parents with less time. But some of them are still very good, and there has been a lot of progress in this part of the language. After each class, corresponding Chinese nursery rhymes and stories are added, but there are still no classics. Parents in every family have limited energy. If children can understand the classic content, or have a clear understanding of a certain course, they don't have to worry about being squeezed out by other children in kindergartens and primary schools in the future. As we all know, in recent years, the state has paid more and more attention to Chinese education. So parents should not only master English, but also pay close attention to Chinese. In this regard, the small-step curriculum arrangement is not bad as a whole, but it needs to be optimized. 3. In addition, the small step course contains four picture books every two months. Generally speaking, these picture books are also suitable for children's age and the quality is ok. It is good that some picture book children are willing to take the trouble to let their parents tell them. And every picture book will have special guidance from teachers. If parents feel that they don't speak well, they can look at the guidance, such as the language frustration and focus when talking about picture books. If they are not sure, they can refer to the guidance and tell their children that this arrangement is very good. Can be used by parents at different levels. However, I think the picture book provided by Xiao Bu is also flawed. For example, every picture book story is simple and unsystematic. Some children like picture books, others don't. So, should the platform come to a questionnaire or something? What about the series of picture books that children highly like? For example, my baby likes little books like Aunt Cotton Candy and Three Brothers Bean. Judging from the children's feedback, she also wants to know if there are any more interesting stories to follow up. It's not a story that comes to an abrupt end. I think there are still many attempts to be made in this regard. If you make a series of contents, such as Chicken Ball and Busy Bear, it may attract children's attention and help cultivate their reading habits and abilities.

4. The length of the class. The video instruction of the small step course is usually 3-5 minutes, which is quite good for Xiaobaobao. Because children just learn to read and can't speak. A three-to-five-minute course, plus extended games by parents, can last about ten minutes, and children can't keep their attention for a long time and learn anything. However, as children grow up slowly, especially when they are about two years old, their curiosity is very heavy, and language is also a time of great explosion. Judging from my child's feedback, the 3-5 minute course as a whole is far from meeting her needs. Every time after class, the child is not satisfied. She wants to continue playing some related things. At this time, due to the limited teaching materials, parents have limited space to play, and children are clamoring to open the textbook box to continue their studies. I don't know about other children in this state, but my family is obvious. Before many classes started, she opened the box and asked the adults to give her lessons. So, with the growth of children's age, should the course extend beyond the main course? Or just lengthen the main course?