Yes, but it is definitely not the quality education we understand. During primary and secondary schools in the United States, we will teach a lot less books than we do, but we will do our homework as late as we do. We are really late, and it is a research topic. Of course, children's research is very simple, but just like our children practice addition and subtraction in ten minutes, they work hard on the topic. They still have social practice and don't have enough time to stop graduating. Although school is early, it is not too early to volunteer for two hours. Who can say that serving in a nursing home is not more tiring than doing homework? This is really a good exercise for comprehensive quality, isn't it, but it doesn't mean it's easy. It is difficult to go to college, and the basic knowledge is really bad. Freshman make-up exam in mathematics. We have learned it since childhood, and our ability to accept it is still relatively strong. It has been a long time. We learn slowly, and they make up the basic knowledge, because accounting children's math is not good for you. Some problems in our senior high school are very difficult in their universities. The teacher writes step by step and the students copy step by step. I heard that they can only use this method, and other teachers don't talk about it, so they can't. It looks very similar to what we learned when we were young, and it is not very quality. However, their discussion topic is really awesome. Listening to their discussion really makes everyone have ideas and the language is fluent and clear. This should be the foundation laid by primary and secondary schools. In fact, it's all the same. When teenagers accept knowledge and decide their character, it's only after a few short years that they can't be strong in everything. No one is perfect, no matter where you work hard, you will be strong.