Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - The Teacher Image of Yu Xiang Education Group
The Teacher Image of Yu Xiang Education Group
1, "Learn to be a teacher and a model", "Engineer of human soul". Now many parents will be angry and many teachers will blush. The proliferation of "teaching for self-interest" makes teachers lose "authority" and education lose "fairness". Take the following three rules as iron discipline, and never be soft: teachers will never accept banquets, gifts or use their parents to do things; The school resolutely "does not collect fees and spend money indiscriminately"; School leaders are determined to be "honest and diligent".

2. The teaching spirit construction goal of Yu Xiang Education Group is "willing to contribute, sensitive to learning, diligent in thinking, brave in practice and good at summing up". "Learning", "thinking" and "practice" are the trilogy of life progress, "being willing to contribute" is the premise, and "being good at summing up" can improve faster. At present, "learning fast" is the most important. People often say, "Give students a glass of water, and the teacher should have a bucket of water". We should always guide teachers to reflect on this point. First, do we have a bucket of water? A few years ago, more than a decade ago or even decades ago, "a bucket of water" has been poured on students for such a long time. How much is left? The speed of knowledge forgetting is as amazing as its growth. Shall we keep this half bucket of water until 2 1 century? Second, with the rapid development of science and culture today, is only one bucket of water enough? Third, even if there is a bucket of water, what is the quality of the existing bucket of water? Is it high-quality mineral water or ordinary tap water? Is it living water or stagnant water? Fourth, with a bucket of water, is it sure to fill the student's glass of water? Do we have the ability to sell oil Weng? If you don't master educational science, even if you have a "jar of water", you may not be able to fill the students' "cups"; Fifth, do we spend the same labor and time pouring students a glass of water? Is there an efficiency problem here? Are we "high input and low output" or "low input and high output"? Sixth, do students have to "pour" a glass of water? Does the teacher teach students how to "fetch water" or wait for "pour water"? Do our students have the ability to draw water? Warn teachers that as "soul engineers", they should constantly enrich themselves and keep learning and exploring in order to meet the needs of the times.

3. Teachers are required to conquer students with "four truths": "true feelings, hard work, real talents and unique opinions". Oppose teachers' authority to subdue students and severely punish "corporal punishment", "disguised corporal punishment" and "psychological punishment"