As far as the national policy is concerned, it is necessary and urgent to carry out cooperative education between home and school. As far as the educational environment is concerned, the unity of society, family and school will have better results. These are the three spaces for children to live, but it may be six hours in school, but it may not be worth six minutes in society and family. The main purpose of the home-school common rail project is to form an educational synergy.
As far as our current work is concerned, the lack of family education does bring some problems to school education. Because parents don't cooperate and cooperate less, it brings many difficulties to work.
As far as our school is concerned, we think that the access to education is blocked. Teachers and parents, parents and children, children and teachers, these three channels are blocked to varying degrees. The channel between teachers and parents is nominally smooth, but in fact it is different. More often, we are expressing our demands or "complaints" to our parents, who call it "making trouble" for teachers. This passage is more one-way, and the teacher points to the parents. This kind of orientation, many times we are not providing educational services for parents, but putting forward needs. Besides, because of all kinds of self-distrust, it is difficult for us to give our parents more advice on their children's growth. In the end, almost all services are attributed to "performance".
The channel between parents and children is also impassable. It should be said that parents know their children best, but in fact, many times, parents know their children least. Especially with the use of mobile phones, children rarely communicate with their parents about things they encounter when using mobile phones. For example, who do you know in social software, how much you spend in the game, and children can judge what you can and can't say when answering questions. Children know the most basic truth, good and evil, beauty and ugliness. They seek advantages and avoid disadvantages, and basically don't say what they can. Even at present, the cuter children are in front of their parents, the more problems there are in online life. The lack of children's activity education in cyberspace should be the most serious problem facing education at present. Primary school is better, but the situation in junior high school is more serious.
The passage between teachers and children should be clear. In fact, facing the new social environment, this road has also been blocked. More often, we are thinking about how to simplify our work, and it is one thing to do less. In addition, we are also facing various social pressures, so many teachers can't study the children in the class calmly. More often, we just pay attention to children's study of their own subjects.
There is another fact that should be the most accessible and ultimately impassable: the passage between teachers in the same class is also impassable. The concept, strategy and method of class management of the head teacher are hardly discussed with the classroom teachers. Similarly, new teachers are not willing to understand the new class management methods. Even in a class, there are several different requirements for attending classes. As a result, there is no synergy between several teachers in a class.
When these paths are not smooth, improving the quality of education and teaching becomes an empty talk. Especially at present, the change of educational concept that points to core literacy will inevitably bring many new problems. Without these channels, the educational reform in the new era will be difficult to carry out continuously and deeply.
solve problems
In order to better obtain the possibility of education, it is very important to combine the strength of the family with that of our teachers. There are some thoughts on the power integration between home and school.
First of all, understand the child's family.
When children arrive at school, they have more or less the shadow of family education, so we need our teachers to observe carefully, get to know our students deeply and understand the background of family education. In particular, the class teacher, the children's family members, the family's educational level and so on all need to know. In addition, we need to know how many single parents are in the class and how many stay behind. For example, who usually brings it, the personality of the person who brings it, and so on. All of them need to be understood and valued. The more you know, the clearer and more detailed you know about the living conditions of the children in the class, which is more conducive to carrying out targeted education. Teaching students in accordance with their aptitude is an educational principle and the starting point for our teachers to improve the quality of education and teaching. Imagine, we don't know the object of our education, how can we educate our children?
Second, believe in the power of the family.
Nothing cares more about children's education than parents themselves. Whatever the reason, this parent cares more about his children than our teacher. Many times, parents are more out of trust in schools and teachers than communication, which makes us feel that families are indifferent to their children's education. They are all children's biological parents, so it is impossible not to care about their growth and development. More or less, they will plan and expect their children's future. Maybe it's because of the lack of communication channels with us, maybe it's because of the pressure of life, maybe it's because we don't know much about children at all, and more because of the lack of methods to discipline children ... In short, many problems have led us to feel indifferent to family education. Another reason is that because of the existence of the children of Benjamin, we can see what our parents can't accept. And many times, we generalize this special, which makes us feel that all families are like this. Such an idea is wrong in logic and terrible in practical work.
We must firmly believe that our family has a strong educational force, which is beyond doubt. As long as we have enough unobstructed channels to build an educational bridge with our families, the integration of "pro" love and "teacher" love will certainly achieve better educational results.
Third, stick to our position.
The reason why we doubt family education may be because the completion of homework is not satisfactory, or because parents do not cooperate enough with other things in the subject. In fact, academic matters really do not belong to the family, or only a very small part belongs to the family. There is specialization in the profession, and the teacher's business is what the teacher does; What parents have to do is what parents have to do. One of the most basic reasons for the "double reduction" is that parents care too much about grades-of course, it is also related to our teachers-who have not conveyed a correct educational concept to their families. The quality of education and teaching, especially the teaching quality, is caused by many reasons, among which the most important factor is the teacher. Entrusting our work to our parents, or expecting our parents to make a lot of efforts for our work, is suspected of shirking responsibility. In fact, more parents listen to the teacher, but there is no way. Imagine that all the educational problems that our professional educators can't solve are finally thrown at parents. Can parents do well? Doing so will inadvertently increase parents' distrust of the school and even cause social conflicts. If the teacher doesn't solve the problem and let the parents solve it, will we feel beaten in the face?