Under the requirements of implementing quality education, how to evaluate students' Excellence, kindness, mediocrity and inferiority? To this end, such standards have been formulated: first, those who have scored 60 points or more in the basic courses stipulated in the syllabus and can find their own specialties and develop them are regarded as passing; Second, if the basic subjects pass or are good, and the special subjects obviously exceed the students of the same grade, it is regarded as good; Third, the basic subject is good, and the specialty subject greatly exceeds the students of the same grade or has been invented and created, which is regarded as excellent; Fourth, only those who pass the basic courses or only those who have developed special courses can be considered as failing; Fifth, only the basic subjects are good, or the specialties are one-sided ahead, which is regarded as abnormal development and degradation. The implementation of this evaluation standard makes most poor students look up and walk, find their own advantages and the road to success, and also makes students with good grades in cultural courses no longer feel good about themselves, thus finding a new path of benign complementarity and harmonious development. Through the practice of one semester, students' enthusiasm for learning is obviously high, and their academic performance in all subjects has been greatly improved. The total score of each subject rose from the penultimate grade to the second grade.