All along, our parents hate the problem of remedial classes in counseling institutions. Some people even think that remedial classes aggravate the involution of education, while others say that all extracurricular remedial classes should be banned. Recently, however, several regions have really issued a document, explicitly prohibiting counseling institutions from making up lessons in cultural classes during compulsory education.

Let's see:

Zhumadian, Henan Province issued a notice prohibiting primary and secondary schools and off-campus training institutions from organizing students to make up classes collectively in compulsory education.

The Education Bureau of Chaohu City, Anhui Province issued a notice that during the summer vacation of 20021,off-campus counseling institutions are not allowed to offer subject training courses to primary and secondary schools, and paid training will end before August 20.

Funing county, Yunnan province issued a notice prohibiting the opening of subject training courses in compulsory education from the summer vacation of 20021.

In addition, Hegang, Henan and Xinxiang, Henan also issued relevant notices.

Then what is discipline training? The subjects in the compulsory education stage are nothing more than Chinese, mathematics, foreign languages, history, politics, geography, physics, chemistry, biology and science. Art subjects such as sports, music and art are not included. To put it bluntly, off-campus training institutions are not allowed to make up cultural courses, and only interest classes are allowed.

Is this news good news or bad news? Judging from the parents' reaction, there are different opinions.

First, off-campus training institutions are not allowed to make up cultural courses, which means that many children can't improve their grades.

Only tutorial institutions are allowed to offer interest classes, and culture classes are not allowed to make up classes. It seems to reduce the burden on students and parents, but it also means that some children have completely lost the way to improve their grades.

Not all parents have the ability to help their children with their homework, not all children have strong self-study ability, and public school education can't meet the needs of all children. What should I do if my child is partial to the subject and his grades are declining and he needs the help of a professional teacher?

In-service teachers are not allowed to make up lessons, and they are not allowed to make up lessons outside the school. Did parents ask tutors to make up lessons one by one? But how can the average family have such strength?

Therefore, it is not necessarily a good thing for those children who have to make up lessons, which means that they have no chance to improve their grades.

Second, prohibiting culture classes from making up lessons may accelerate the stratification of education, but it is not good for the children of the bottom people.

It may be a good thing in the short term to ban make-up classes in compulsory education. Everyone doesn't have to make up lessons, and the starting line is the same again. But in the long run, it is likely to accelerate the stratification of education, and the children of the bottom people will have no way out more and more.

Because it is forbidden to make up lessons anyway, it is hardly influenced by rich children, because people can ask private tutors to make up lessons, no matter how expensive. But what about children from ordinary families? A few people can afford it, so the gap between us will widen after a long time, won't it?

Third, counseling institutions can be standardized and need not be completely banned, which is beneficial to everyone.

Some people say that counseling institutions need to be regulated, not completely banned.

At present, counseling institutions have many problems because they are not standardized. Many counseling institutions are seriously ahead of time in education and have serious false propaganda, which constantly creates educational anxiety. If these problems can be solved, counseling institutions can still exist.

Some time ago, the Ministry of Education has stipulated the class hours, fees and teaching contents of off-campus tutoring institutions, which can be strictly enforced by all localities.

1, class hours: one class can't last more than 45 minutes, the online class can't last more than 8: 30 pm, and the online class can't last more than 9: 00 pm.

2. Charge: It is not allowed to charge more than 60 class hours at a time, and it is not allowed to charge more than three months at a time.

3. Content: You can't go beyond advanced teaching, and you are not allowed to do homework after class.

Can cultural classes be completely banned in compulsory education? Will it be rolled out all over the country? Personally, I find it difficult.

Many people think that this means that in the future, outside tutoring institutions will prohibit tutoring cultural classes. Personally, I think it is unlikely.

It is a big market for counseling institutions to cancel cultural classes to make up lessons, which involves many people's employment problems. In addition, cancellation is not good for most people, especially the exam-oriented education now. Make-up lessons are just needed, and simply putting an end to them is of little significance. As long as the national supervision is strict, it may not be a good thing for everyone to make up classes according to regulations.

Personal opinion:

Make-up lessons exist in many countries, so the problem of make-up lessons is not a scourge, and everyone need not be so annoying. If the cram school for cultural courses is really cancelled, the educational stratification will be more severe, and the children of the bottom people will have no chance to rise.

What do you think of this? Share it too!