Integrity risk exists in every power post, and there is integrity risk when there is power. Anyone who exercises power may abuse public power and seek personal gain, which will lead to corruption. In order to do a good job of prevention, combined with the actual work, we should find the risk of clean government, evaluate the risk level, optimize the power structure, standardize the administrative discretion, promote the open and transparent operation of power, strengthen prevention and control, implement early warning and disposal, and adhere to dynamic management. We should prevent and control from ideological and moral, post responsibilities, business processes, systems, mechanisms, external environment and other aspects, and do a good job of prevention in advance. For the potential risk of clean government, we should formulate preventive measures in a targeted manner, control the risk of clean government in all aspects of power operation, and minimize the risk of corruption. It is of great significance to make our cadres and workers make fewer or no mistakes and study and work better.
Two, clear the main methods and main tasks to carry out the prevention and control of clean government risks.
According to the requirements of the document, it should be carried out in an orderly manner in accordance with the four-stage work method.
The first stage is the preparation stage. Main working methods and tasks at this stage:
The first is to make a plan. All regions and departments should conscientiously study and formulate specific implementation plans to promote the prevention and control of clean government risks in accordance with the requirements of the Implementation Measures and their own reality. The plan is not only the deployment of the first stage, but also the overall planning and arrangement of the four stages. It is necessary to specify the guiding ideology, working principles, working objectives, working contents, methods and steps, organization and leadership, assessment, etc. And there must be detailed arrangements and regulations. It must be clear that the main person in charge of the unit is the first responsible person, and it must be personally grasped and personally implemented. Once the plan is approved, it must be resolutely implemented.
The second is deep mobilization. All localities and departments should hold a general meeting of all cadres and workers, carry out publicity and mobilization, unify their thinking, raise awareness, clarify tasks and make overall arrangements. Constantly improve the ideological understanding and risk awareness of cadres and workers, enhance the consciousness, initiative and enthusiasm of carrying out risk prevention and control of clean government, so that all cadres and workers have a sense of responsibility and urgency.
The second stage is the specific organization and implementation stage. Main working methods and tasks at this stage:
The first is to examine the risk of clean government (preventive measures in advance). God has four tasks:
1, clean up the specification permissions. Focus on clearing rights and confirming rights, optimize management by authority, and standardize the operation of business power. This is a meticulous work. Every department and unit has a "three-set" work plan, each unit, department and post has clear powers and responsibilities, and everyone has specific tasks. In this regard, a comprehensive cleaning should be carried out. Three effects can be achieved through comprehensive and serious cleaning. First, it can fully reflect the various powers and power lists of the department and the unit (compile a "power list" to clarify the name, content, subject and legal basis of power). The second is to decompose each power into various departments and jobs according to the power list, and clarify the responsible subject. The third is to draw a flow chart of power operation. Only by figuring out how much power we have, how much responsibility we have and what the running procedures are can we work better and lay a good foundation for us.
2. Find the risk point of honesty. On the basis of clearing rights, confirming rights and clarifying responsibilities, find out the risk points of clean government. Integrity risk points are divided into post integrity risk points (fill in the list of individual integrity risk points and prevention and control measures: note: this form is filled in by everyone, signed by myself and the section chief, and summarized by the leaders in charge first, and then summarized by the leading group for integrity risk prevention and control, and determined by collective research) and departmental integrity risk points (fill in the list of individual integrity risk points and prevention and control measures: it belongs to collective research, such as triple and one big).
The so-called post integrity risk point is, in layman's terms, a link or a point where problems may occur in the work of all our positions exercising power. Mainly from three aspects to find. First, in the exercise of power, the risk of power abuse caused by excessive concentration of power, irregular operating procedures and excessive discretion is highlighted; Second, in terms of system and mechanism, focus on finding the risk that power may get out of control due to imperfect rules and regulations and imperfect supervision and restriction mechanism; Third, in terms of ideology and morality, focus on finding the risk of behavioral anomie that may be induced by unstable ideals and beliefs, unstable work style and unstable professional ethics. In short, through the method of "looking for yourself, others leading, mutual inspection and collective decision", one link, one link to investigate, one post to judge.
Depending on the different responsibilities and division of labor, a post may have only one integrity risk point, multiple integrity risk points or none. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the specific situation to ensure that the risk points of integrity are identified and verified. After the collective examination and approval, according to the feedback collected, supervise and improve the risk points of post integrity.
The so-called unit integrity risk point refers to the integrity risk of the unit in exercising the power of administrative examination and approval, administrative punishment, property distribution, resource allocation, judicial discretion, project management and election in will to power. Investigation should be aimed at departments and units to exercise every power (or a link in power), not at specific positions (individuals). For example, if a unit has the right to distribute property, it can list the right to distribute funds above a certain amount as the risk point of unit integrity.
3. Evaluate the risk level of post integrity. Combined with the actual work, the post risk level is put forward, approved and publicized. Grading the risk of post integrity is conducive to departments and units to better establish and improve the prevention and control responsibility system and formulate targeted prevention and control measures. Integrity risk level assessment is based on finding integrity risk points and objectively analyzing risk level, risk harm and risk control effect according to the survey results, so as to determine the post integrity risk level, that is, "high" risk (involving major decision-making matters, appointment and removal of important personnel, major project arrangements and large amount of funds, with decision-making, approval, discretion and decision-making power in affairs management, etc.). ) "Medium" risk (involving organization and personnel, financial examination and approval, material procurement and management, fund audit management, and the correlation with the main responsibilities and human, financial and material rights of the unit, etc. Leadership positions and specific undertaking positions with certain administrative law enforcement, administrative licensing, departmental affairs management and execution rights); "Low" risk (involving leadership and non-leadership positions with certain comprehensive coordination function in daily work and leadership positions and jobs with certain relationship with the main responsibilities and property rights of the unit). Level 3, approved by the leading group.
4, the establishment of integrity risk prevention and control account. The purpose is to facilitate data perfection, control check and dynamic management.
The first is to formulate prevention and control measures (medium-term prevention and control mechanism)
First, establish and improve the prevention and control system. Departments and units are responsible subjects for the prevention and control of clean government risks. The "top leader" of the unit is the first person responsible for the prevention and control of clean government risks. According to the management authority of cadres, we will build a responsibility system for prevention and control supervision with hierarchical management, hierarchical responsibility and responsibility to people. The "top leader" of the department unit is responsible for the prevention and control of senior clean government risk posts; Other team members are responsible for the prevention and control of post integrity risks within the scope of division of labor.
The second is to formulate and improve the risk prevention and control system of clean government. Departments and units should highlight the risk points and classification of clean government, approve major projects, improve the system, and enhance the pertinence and operability of the system. Specifically:
(1) Improve the risk prevention and control system. The risk point of clean government directly exposes the weak link of anti-corruption system construction. Where is the risk point of power operation, the system construction should follow which link of power operation. As for the exercise of power, it is too centralized, and we should actively explore effective ways of decentralization and control; If the operation procedure is not standardized, the process reengineering should be carried out according to the actual situation; If the discretion is too large, the standard of quantitative discretion should be further refined; In terms of system and mechanism, it is necessary to establish and improve the prevention and control system in accordance with the requirements of establishing and improving the system of punishing and preventing corruption, combined with the actual work, and highlight the operational level. In terms of ideology and morality, we should constantly improve the system of clean government education, enrich the connotation and innovate the carrier. According to the ideological reality and work practice of cadres in party member, we should carry out clean government education through special party classes, demonstration education, warning education and post clean government education to enhance the awareness of risk prevention and control of the educated.
(2) Improve the prevention and control system according to the risk level. Highlight high-level clean government risk posts and put the construction of high-level clean government risk prevention and control system in a very important position. All departments and units should thoroughly analyze the possibility of high-level clean government risks, formulate prevention and control measures one by one, rationally allocate power, and use systems to ensure the openness and transparency of power operation.
(3) Improve the prevention and control system of major projects. The construction of major projects involves the power operation of multi-sectoral units and is a key area where corruption is prone to occur frequently. It is of great significance to improve the prevention and control system. On the one hand, it is necessary to determine the subject of power and implement the construction of prevention and control system based on the progress of major projects and the operation of power in all links. On the other hand, it is necessary to highlight key links such as project establishment, bidding, project construction management, project audit, fund management, quality acceptance and contract performance, strengthen system construction, and integrate laws and regulations into business processes to ensure project quality and safety, safe use of funds and safe growth of cadres.
The third is to strengthen prevention and control supervision (post-disposal measures).
Targeted warning education through letters and visits and key reminders. Admonish and correct mistakes by warning, exhortation and rectification; Order rectification through measures such as rectification within a time limit and compulsory performance.
The third stage is the assessment stage. Main working methods and tasks at this stage:
The first is self-examination and evaluation. All departments and units shall conduct self-assessment against relevant documents, especially the implementation of anti-corruption risk prevention and control measures and systems, and form a self-inspection report.
The second is democratic appraisal. Organize the cadres, employees and representatives of the clients of the unit to make democratic comments on the implementation of the prevention and control of clean government risks in the department and the unit.
The third is the assessment team to check and evaluate. On the basis of self-examination and democratic appraisal, the assessment team takes the form of listening to reports, consulting materials and watching the scene to conduct assessment item by item.
The fourth is to publicize the assessment results. Finally, the comprehensive evaluation opinions of annual inspection and assessment are formed.
The fourth stage is the modification stage. Main working methods and tasks at this stage:
The first is the application of the evaluation results. The assessment results are excellent, which should be used as an important basis for evaluating the first; The evaluation results are good and qualified, and suggestions for improvement are put forward; Unqualified informed criticism shall be rectified within a time limit, and the qualification of Pingxian Pingyou shall be cancelled at the same time, and the units that violate discipline and law shall be held accountable.
The second is to implement early warning and disposal. Early warning disposal is a measure to remind, educate or punish the problems found in the prevention and control of clean government risks. Its purpose is to solve problems before violations of discipline and law appear, and to alert and save cadres in time. There are four specific measures for early warning and disposal, namely: reminder, letter inquiry, interview and disposal.
Reminder: It is necessary to promptly remind and prevent problems that may lead to corruption.
Inquiry letter: The relatively concentrated and obvious risks of clean government should be rectified in time.
Interview: for the honest and clean government risks that strongly reflect and may induce real corruption, according to the actual situation, interview the person in charge, point out the problems and make rectification within a time limit.
Disposal: If there is a serious risk of clean government, and there is no obvious improvement after the interview, the main person in charge, the person in charge and the person in charge of the post shall be dealt with accordingly or the responsibility of the relevant responsible person shall be investigated. Major problems or corruption should be investigated and dealt with according to discipline and law.
From the above four stages, we can see that the management process of anti-corruption risk prevention is a cyclical and spiraling process, a process of continuously strengthening prevention and control and reducing anti-corruption risks, a process of long-term revision, summary and improvement, and a daily task of constantly advancing with the times in anti-corruption work.