The educational concept of the education voucher system was first put forward by MiltonFriedman, a master of liberal economics, in the 1950s. Today, although some countries such as the United States and Britain have implemented the "study voucher" system, it is still a minority in the world. The reason is probably the unreasonable phenomenon of robbing the poor and helping the rich in the voucher system. Perhaps this is also the inevitable gap between theory and practice. As early as 2000, the voucher system triggered a big discussion in Hong Kong. At that time, the idea of * * * was to implement the voucher system in universities. However, the barriers of social opinions are clear, there is no consensus, and finally it is gone. Now, the education voucher system has dawned again. Aside from the conspiracy theory that the voucher system is pleasing to anyone, it is indeed a great innovation and a good start for education reform in China and Hongkong. It is worth noting that this voucher system is quite different from Fleming's original design intention, which can be described as a voucher system with China and Hongkong characteristics. Because the Hong Kong-style voucher system is innovative on the basis of the original voucher system, it can successfully plug many loopholes in the system. So the definition of non-profit kindergarten exists? In a certain gray area, faced with 2 billion learning brokerage machines every year, those profitable kindergartens can take the opportunity to change their methods and raise tuition fees, so that parents with school vouchers can pay higher tuition fees more comfortably. In this regard, * * *' s "voucher" design cleverly plugs this loophole, because only those local non-profit kindergartens that charge less than 24,000 yuan a year can enjoy the "voucher" subsidy. In addition, the Hong Kong-style voucher system stipulates that students can only enter non-profit-making kindergartens with vouchers to prevent wealthy students from flocking to high-quality private kindergartens with vouchers. With this arrangement, * * * can successfully resolve the accusation that the voucher system robs the poor and helps the rich. Of course, there is no need for society to expect too much from the voucher system. After all, the financial assistance provided to parents is limited. Parents who want their children to receive quality education still have to "inject capital" before they can enroll their children in "famous brand" kindergartens. The cleverness of * * lies in making full use of market forces and changing the way of education funding from subsidizing schools to subsidizing parents, so as to urge kindergartens to improve the quality of school education. It can be seen that the voucher system is a new way of education funding that has really become popular in the process of privatization and marketization of public education reform.

A simple D is to hold the student's head and ask for financial aid. At present, each student in ordinary kindergartens receives * * * funds 13.

000, that is, every kindergarten student admitted to the school 13.

000, where 10.

000 dollars for parents and 3000 dollars for school training teachers.