How do you think that the senior one teacher in Anyuan County once asked for a salary bonus of 220,000 yuan, but did not ask for the cancellation of winter and summer vacations, and compared himself with Mr. Yao? If virtue is not in place, there will be disaster.

Zeng was a geography teacher in Anyuan County, Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province, with a college degree.

So the teacher preached and taught to solve doubts. Teachers are worthy of respect, and their salaries are not lower than those of local civil servants. However, there are also very few teachers who pay attention to their words and deeds and are worthy of the title of "teacher" and the profession of teachers.

Anyuan County Education and Sports Bureau received a petition application from the State Bureau for Letters and Calls and made a reply.

The main points of the county education bureau's reply are as follows: in 20 19 years, the per capita salary of local civil servants was 75622 yuan, and the per capita salary of compulsory education teachers was 7 148 1 yuan. In 2020, the performance appraisal will be reissued according to the standard of 4200 yuan per capita, which has reached the requirement of "no less than".

Moreover, Mr. Zeng does not belong to the compulsory education stage and does not have the qualification to apply for "not less than".

To sum up, according to the notice of 20 19, the county education and sports bureau reissued the performance that teachers in compulsory education deserved for 20 19 years, while Ceng Laoshi asked primary and secondary school teachers in the county to reissue the bonuses equal to those of local civil servants for 20 17, 20 18 and 20 19 years.

Faced with this reply from the County Education and Sports Bureau, Ceng Laoshi applied to the county and municipal governments for review of letters and visits, and in May this year sued the Ganzhou municipal government for "inaction".

On July 1 1, the written reply of Ganzhou Municipal People's Government to this lawsuit began to circulate on the Internet.

Interested friends can search the full version of Ganzhou Municipal People's Government's Reply on Administrative Litigation in Ceng Laoshi.

The Ganzhou Municipal Government stated in its defense that the plaintiff's claim did not fall within the scope of administrative litigation, and the defendant had no legal responsibility to deal with the plaintiff's complaint, nor did he have the responsibility to reply to the leapfrog complaint, and requested the court to dismiss the plaintiff's claim.