The atmosphere of a school is related to the level, courage and enthusiasm of the dean. I prefer that leaders of first-class schools attach importance to culture and art, but what is culture and art should be clarified. Some people think that school culture is just dressing up the campus, putting up slogans and engaging in many theme activities, all of which are superficial efforts. Compared with teachers, school culture means that school leaders respect teachers, respect teachers and firmly believe in teachers. Teachers and teachers have a tacit understanding and live happily together. In some colleges and universities, teachers have a heavy workload, great pressure and are very tired. This is not enough, because the relationship between school leaders and teachers, between teachers and teachers has deteriorated, making teachers feel more tired.

It is not easy to be a good school leader, which should be recognized. In fact, it is good for the colonel to have core ideas and dreams, but he must not impose his own core ideas on others. Some school leaders insist that their own colleges should have "characteristics", but for this "characteristics", teachers may fidget and be particularly annoyed. School leaders are the core of university management, and all the development trends of universities are related to the ideas of school leaders at the same time. It doesn't matter if the teacher doesn't pay attention to the teaching results and is only busy with daily affairs, even if he is sometimes asked to do some inspection materials. So do you think this kind of school leader can have good curriculum management? Secondly, now some school leaders only care about their own sales performance, especially in some competitions, they can only be greedy and never pay attention to teachers' problems.

As a school leader, without teachers, there is no influence of school leaders. Without teachers' teaching achievements, there would be no sales performance of school leaders in management. But now it is difficult for teachers to do it, but the contribution belongs to the school leaders. A very good professional school leader went to a low-end college. For various reasons, teachers and students developed a careless habit-what do you think he used to make the college formal as soon as possible? What we want to make clear is that there is a basic guarantee for work style and discipline, and even this basic guarantee is gone. Is culture and art meaningful? Similarly,

No matter how much you pay attention to the construction of campus civilization, your school-running exam results have been hovering at the low end. I think social development will definitely give a blow! I met a well-known authoritative expert, and the idealization and complexity of culture and education are all unreasonable-but the results of running school examinations are untenable. In the end, is it not sad? In fact, grasping organizational discipline and teaching achievements are actually culture and art-because, in a broad sense, all human means are culture and art, that is to say, according to the basic types of campus culture: material civilization, institutionalized management and spiritual culture, isn't grasping organizational discipline institutionalized management? Isn't it just to improve the brand of the university to grasp the exam results? So, some things don't have to be completely cut off!