Strict teacher is the guarantee and foundation of high flyers. Under the same conditions, there is no doubt that strict teachers produce many excellent students. Strict teachers have played a great role in the growth of Gaotu. With the teacher's strictness, the condition of the apprentice's height is formed, and the apprentice's height becomes possible. Because students' self-control is poor after all, and there is no teacher's "strictness", students often take many detours and may even take evil paths. What is strictly opposite to teachers is "conformity", that is, the arbitrariness of teachers' teaching behavior-arbitrary management of students, arbitrary teaching content, arbitrary requirements for students, arbitrary teaching methods, and arbitrary arrangement of exam assignments ... "Strict learning from teachers is ruined by following". If teachers are arbitrary in teaching behavior, they should be strict with students, but not with students, which will inevitably lead to a bad relationship between teachers and students, resulting in teachers' teaching work and students' learning. Teachers' "following the trend" will only make mistakes for students, so that they can't follow them, have no rules to follow, and their studies are in a mess.
It is an inevitable result for a master to take an apprentice, and it is also the best proof of strict teacher. There are many ways to evaluate a teacher, and whether to teach "top students" is one of them, which is also a more practical method. Under the same conditions, some classes can win the "Top Scholar" and "Olympic Prize", while others are undergraduates, so it has nothing to do with teachers. Of course, there are many factors for students' success, and so are teachers' influences on students. It is impossible for us to judge only in certain aspects. But in any case, the teacher who can teach top students is at least not a bad teacher, which should be certain. Of course, "caring teachers" (teachers who focus on caring for students) can also teach "excellent students", and may even teach "excellent students" better than "strict teachers", which is beyond the scope of this article, and the author will discuss it in another article. We don't need to doubt that a strict teacher can teach a noble apprentice. The appearance of "high map" is an affirmation of the role of teachers' strictness.
Thinking 5. Can only a strict teacher teach a noble apprentice?
The answer is yes: no! It exaggerates the role of teachers. The theory of dialectical materialism tells us that the internal cause of the development and change of things is the fundamental condition and the external cause is the auxiliary condition. The development and growth of a student can not be separated from the patient guidance and active help of teachers, but "chickens can't be hatched with stones" and the students' "height" is not high, and their own factors are the key. As the old saying goes, "the master leads the door, and the practice is in the individual." Yan Shi may have played a great role in the growth of "high disciples", but it does not mean that all high disciples are from Yan Shi's hands, and not all strict teachers can produce "high disciples".
The same student will have different results under different teacher education. In contrast, "Yan teacher" teaches better than "mediocre teacher" and "non-strict teacher", but there is no guarantee that "excellent apprentice" will be produced.
Viewpoint 2: "Strict teacher" does not necessarily produce "high apprentice"
Since ancient times, it has been accepted that "strict teachers make excellent students". However, can "strict teachers" certainly produce excellent students?
Philosophically speaking, man's future is in his own hands. Internal factors are primary and external conditions are secondary. In other words, whether a person can become a top student depends on his subjective initiative, while strict teacher is an external factor and plays an influential role. If a person is diligent and studious, he can achieve something even without "strict teacher"; If you are a subjective person who doesn't work hard, it is useless whether you are a strict teacher, a normal teacher or a competent teacher. In any case, it is internal factors that play a decisive role.
From a practical point of view, how many great men, ancient and modern, Chinese and foreign, all came from "strict teachers"? In today's society, "strict teachers" abound. Is every one of his students a "top student"? Zhang Haidi succeeded by self-study, Edison did his own research, and so on. Teachers in ancient private schools in China were not strict. However, did all his disciples get into the Jinshi? Or a scholar? There are many rules and regulations in schools now, but are there many talents trained?
The reason why "a strict teacher makes a brilliant apprentice" is that "a strict teacher makes a brilliant apprentice" because "a strict teacher meets a brilliant apprentice". In fact, "strict teacher" does not necessarily produce "high apprentice".