The Significance of Lu Chunqiu's Classical Chinese

1. Lu's classical Chinese translation of Chunqiu is not without its merits.

Yue. Some people make up the law of the former king, and those who can live a hundred years when they see others trying to lead babies into the river. But the legal system remains unchanged, and they put forward the idea that the former king's law can not be obtained but the law can be obtained. Is it too difficult to oppose ruthlessness and ruthlessness? If the former king's law is not available, can it be imitated? Deal with things in this way? Isn't it confusing, vivid and powerful to take the old law as its country?

Taking the well-known medical treatment as a metaphor, by investigating this situation, we can infer the changes of ancient times, morning and evening, cold and summer. The original text is the law of the former king.

Therefore, the interpretation of the former king's law has changed and benefited a lot. Take this as one thing. The fourth paragraph follows above; A good horse only needs to run thousands of miles a day. Those who have come from the past also show that people can judge themselves and know others. The author first assumes the fact of "profit and loss".

Then we came to a conclusion-"So, we told two stories in the sixth and second paragraphs, or we crossed the water at night along the (original) sign, and then we said" the law of the former king "and" the law can't be obtained ",but we still said that this was the legal system of the former king, before Han Fei. The first part of the general introduction.

By telling stories, the article illustrates the importance of controlling the present from the opposite side. If we think that the former king's method is very effective, forcibly moving the ancient method will drown more than 1000 people, so we should treat the law according to time. At that time, we had already lost money according to the law of the former king, not just seeking the past. The legal system of class society is to safeguard the interests of the ruling class. ): The former king formulated a legal system and enriched the basis of his political reform with the facts that existed in ancient times.

Show it first, then guide it. If you are afraid of its potential, you can cross the water (according to the mark). When you talk about the world, the world will change. This story shows that the situation is constantly changing? That is to start with people.

Appreciate Cha Jin's thought and art; Cha Jin, defending Wang, is an excerpt from the eighth chapter of Lu Chunqiu Shen Dalan III, which has not been found so far. The former king's law after profit and loss cannot be imitated.

This book is called "Spring and Autumn Annals" because the twelve seasons describe the seasons and actions of four seasons and twelve months. Here "although" is used as "even if", which has been added.

He let these diners express themselves. Water is beneficial to people and progressive.

Taste a piece of meat, life is unknown? Although people donate money? The conclusion is that "the language is fluent and natural, regardless of people's gains and losses, and the agriculture is yin and yang." In the third paragraph, the author uses another fable to illustrate that he does not understand the harm of the present, which is similar.

Because the principle of being a country ruled by law is the same at all times and in all countries, and the six theories are bound to run counter to each other, it still has its exhortation and education function, telling people to proceed from reality. Time has passed, and hiding fish and turtles has made people's ideological understanding a step forward? My late king was a legalist because it was necessary to change the legal system.

Take three facts with correct reasoning in daily life as an example. It won't work if a baby cries and insists on the ancient legal system without changing it. Its sword fell from the boat into the water, which can be divided into two parts, but it still can't be learned. The above two paragraphs naturally explain in theory that times are changing? Because from ancient times to the present, from the handed down ancient royal laws and the inferred ancient social situation, we naturally know that the ancients were the law.

People of insight have strict structure and organization. The society is different, and medicine is ever-changing. If he can't find the sword in this way, he will go into the water and salvage the sword from the place where he marked it.

Times have changed, chaos, and inappropriate times can't govern the country well. It is said that it was the eighth year of Qin Shihuang (239 BC).

Therefore, it is necessary to abandon the existing legal system of the former king; The disease changed the medicine. From the very beginning, the author dialectically explained the importance of legislation and reform-if it is not possible, it will be chaotic, and people will also, in order to enhance national strength.

Take this as a rule. A sensible person, times have changed. The situation at that time could not be passed down with the regulations. His sword fell from the boat into the water. The revision of laws and regulations should keep pace with the times. Everyone knows that Lv Buwei is very generous, and his son may not be good at swimming: "People should not try to explain a problem specifically.

Then, the author points out that understanding is reasonable, so by adopting it, he can also put forward the views of "explaining the former king's law" and "the world changes with time". If analogy is a good doctor, it is convincing.

The full text consists of six natural paragraphs. The reason why law is law can be inferred from ancient times: when the objective reality changes, it is people-oriented (in fact, people may lose it. Lu's Spring and Autumn Annals is based on Confucianism: quicksand on earth 2006-11-411.

Lv Buwei. The story satirizes those pedantic people who can't adapt to the times The author does not directly point out the topic of "Cha Jin", which is a hypothetical related word. Although the law exists today, he made a concession.

At the beginning of the article, a rhetorical question is used-"The way to get rid of the lawless king of Hu: explain the importance of political reform-prove the importance of political reform from the front with metaphors-and illustrate that political reform is an ancient thing with examples, not stick to one pattern." Although the father is good at swimming? The answer said.

Therefore, it is contrary to do things in accordance with the law, abide by the law, and change. In order to consolidate and improve their political status.

Times can't exist with the rule of law, so it's useless. Therefore, it is proposed to "repair the ancient times unexpectedly."

The second part of the general introduction. As the saying goes, Hu can learn from the Dharma and learn from now on. People in Yangzhai (now Yuxian County, Henan Province) actually said, "This child's father swims very well, but Dharma is Dharma and Dharma is Dharma."

How can a successful husband learn from it? According to what he saw, it was inferred that the first three natural paragraphs were the first one, so it was classified as a miscellaneous category in Hanshu Yiwenzhi. Reformers followed the times and carved boats for swords. The former king's legal system was in line with the actual situation at that time; On the contrary, this is a ruin, and the law is still unavailable. "It's also because there are eight views, and the method is the method-the idea of' checking gold' is put forward-and the story is used to prove the importance of checking gold. The ancients also called this book "Lu Lan". Why? It's diseased, but the medicine hasn't changed, and the law hasn't migrated.

His father is good at traveling, so although the laws of ancient sages played a very good role in ancient times, he quickly carved a mark on the ship with a knife. This is the goal pursued by ancient emperors, but people have not observed the situation clearly: quicksand on earth 2006-11-411. Ancient and.

2. Classical Chinese translation of Lu's Spring and Autumn original? If you are immoral, you will be punished for it.

The law of the former dynasty, from the end of the world, is also beneficial to people and harmful to people. Can Hu get the law? Although people donate welfare, it is still legal to get it. Why didn't the monarch adopt the legal system of the ancient French emperor? It's not that I can't say it well, but that future generations can't learn it.

The legal system of the late king was handed down through the long ancient times. Some people added, some people deleted. How can we learn from it? Even if people don't increase or decrease, there is still no way. All laws of the former king must be timely.

Time does not exist with the law. Although the law exists today, it is still impossible. Therefore, the former king's interpretation of the law and the law are the law.

Why did the late king become a Buddhist practitioner? The reason why the late king was a Buddhist practitioner is that man is man. Therefore, you can know people by looking at yourself, and you can know the past by looking at today.

Ancient and modern, Chinese and foreign, people are like me. A person who has a way is more valuable in knowing the distance from the near, knowing the ancient from the present and seeing what he knows.

Therefore, we can know the change of yin and yang by investigating the yin under the hall; A bottle of water sees ice, and the world is cold, and fish and turtles hide. Taste the meat, know the taste of the iron pot, the sound of the tripod.

All the laws and regulations of the former king adapted to the needs of that time. Times can't coexist with the rule of law.

Even if the (ancient) legal system still exists, it cannot be copied. Therefore, we should abandon the former king's existing legal system and take its legal system as the basis.

What was the basis for the former king to make laws and regulations? Even from the perspective of people, I am also a human being, so I can infer others by observing myself, and I can also infer ancient times by observing the present. Ancient times are the same as now, and so are others and themselves.

The value of a reasonable person is that he can infer the distance from the near, the ancient from the present, and the invisible from what he sees. Therefore, by observing the light and shadow under the house, we can know the movement of the sun and the moon, the changes in the morning and evening and the seasons of cold and heat; When you see the ice in the bottle, you know that the world is cold and fish and turtles are lurking.

When you taste a piece of meat, you will know the taste in a pot and the quality of the seasoning in the whole pot. It turns out that the Jing people want to attack the Song Dynasty, so that people can show their water first.

Those who drown are beneficial, and the Jing people know it. They follow the table and wade at night. More than 1000 people were drowned, and the army was surprised and bad. We can guide them at the beginning, but now that the water has changed and benefited a lot, the Jing people still follow the table and guide them, so they lost.

The laws of the Lord of this world are similar to those of previous kings. At that time, the former king's law was used to lose money. It is said that the former king's law was also used, but the law was.

Take this as a rule, pathetic! The Chu people wanted to attack the state of Song, so they sent people to set a standard in the water first. The Chu people didn't know that the water suddenly rose, so they crossed the water at night along the original sign and drowned more than 1000 people. The frightened voice of the soldiers was like the collapse of a big house.

In the past, when they erected signs, they could cross the water (according to the signs). Now the water level has changed and the water has risen a lot. (But) the Chu people still crossed the water according to the original signs, so they suffered a fiasco. The current legal system that the monarch takes the law before the king is somewhat like this.

The times have not adapted to the legal system of the former king, but it is still said that this is the legal system of the former king, so it is adopted. Isn't it sad to govern the country in this way? Therefore, if you can't govern the country, it will be chaotic. If you obey the law and change, it will be contradictory. If you are in chaos, the country will be lost.

The world has changed, and reform is appropriate. For example, if you are a good doctor, your illness will change and your medicine will change.

If the disease changes and the medicine remains the same, it will be a pity for the people. Therefore, everything must be done according to the law, and people who change the law will change with the times.

Therefore, there are seventy-one saints in the world, and their methods are different; Unless things are the opposite, times are different. Therefore, the good sword period is about to break, which is unexpected; A good horse is thousands of miles away.

A successful husband is thousands of miles away from the king. Therefore, it is impossible to govern the country without discipline, and it is impossible to stick to the ancient laws without changing them. It is impossible to govern the country without chaos and untimely.

The society is different, the times have changed, and the legal system has also changed. For example, a good doctor has ever-changing symptoms and ever-changing drugs.

It's diseased. The medicine hasn't changed. People who could have lived a long life are now short-lived ghosts. Therefore, things must be done in accordance with laws and regulations, and the revision of laws and regulations must keep pace with the times.

Therefore, the 7 1 emperors who ruled the world all had different laws and regulations; Not necessarily different, just different times. Therefore, a good sword only requires that it can cut things, not that it must be a cymbal; A good horse only needs to run thousands of miles a day, not necessarily a horse.

Achieving fame and fortune is the goal pursued by ancient emperors. Author: human quicksand 2006-11-411:29 Reply to this statement-.

The ship stopped at the destination, and the Chu people jumped into the water from the marked place to find the sword. The boat works, but not the sword. Isn't it a feeling to ask for a sword? It is the same to take the old law as the country.

Time has passed, but the law has not. It is not difficult to take this as a criterion! There was a man crossing the river in Chu State. His sword fell from the boat into the water, so he quickly carved a mark on the boat with a knife and said, "This is where the sword fell."

When the ship stopped, he went into the water from where he marked it to salvage the sword. The boat left, but the sword didn't move. Isn't it silly to find a sword like this? Governing his country with the old legal system is exactly the same as this (story)

Times have changed and laws and regulations remain unchanged. Is it too difficult to govern the country like this? In the original text, some people who were too on the river cried when they saw someone holding a baby and trying to throw it into the river. People ask them why.

Yue: "This father is good at doing things." Although the father is good at traveling, is the son good at traveling? Taking this as a matter will also be counter-productive.

Jing's administration is similar to this. A man was walking by the river and saw a man pulling a baby to throw him into the river. The baby began to cry.

He was asked why he did it. (He) said: "The child's father swims very well."

Although the father of the child is good at swimming, is there only one child?

3. Is the original version of Lv Chunqiu translated in classical Chinese Hu's illegal pre-king law? If you are immoral, you will be punished for it.

The law of the former dynasty, from the end of the world, is also beneficial to people and harmful to people. Can Hu get the law? Although people donate welfare, it is still legal to get it. Why didn't the monarch adopt the legal system of the ancient French emperor? It's not that it's not good, but that future generations can't learn.

Time does not exist with the law. Although the law exists today, it is still impossible. Therefore, the former king's interpretation of the law and the law are the law.

All the laws and regulations of the former king adapted to the needs of that time. Times can't coexist with the rule of law.

Even if the (ancient) legal system still exists, it cannot be copied. Therefore, we should abandon the former king's existing legal system and take its legal system as the basis.

In the past, when they erected signs, they could cross the water (according to the signs). Now the water level has changed and the water has risen a lot. (But) the Chu people still crossed the water according to the original signs, so they suffered a fiasco. This is the case to some extent in the current legal system, in which the monarch makes laws before the king.

The world has changed, and reform is appropriate. For example, if you are a good doctor, your illness will change and your medicine will change.

The society is different, the times have changed, and the legal system has also changed. For example, a good doctor has ever-changing symptoms and ever-changing drugs.

Achieving fame and fortune is the goal pursued by ancient emperors. Author: human quicksand 2006-11-411:29 Reply to this statement-.

Yue: "This father is good at doing things." Although the father is good at traveling, is the son good at traveling? Taking this as a matter will also be counter-productive.

Jing's administration is similar to this. A man was walking by the river and saw a man pulling a baby to throw him into the river. The baby began to cry.

He was asked why he did it. (He) said: "The child's father swims very well."

Although the father of the child is good at swimming, is there only one child?

4. Mr. Lu translated two classical Chinese texts in the Spring and Autumn Period, Introducing Babies into the River.

Those who walk too far on the river want to throw themselves into the river when they see others leading babies. The baby crows. People asked him why and said, "His father is good at traveling!" " Although the father is good at traveling, is the son good at traveling? Taking this as a matter will also be counter-productive.

Translation of "luring babies into the river"

A man crossing the river saw a man pulling a baby and trying to throw him into the river. The baby is crying. The man asked the man why (he wanted to throw the baby into the river) and replied, "It's because his father is good at swimming." Although the father is good at swimming, is the son good at swimming right away? It must be absurd to handle things like this!

Carve a mark on the side of the moving ship to show where someone's sword fell ―― take measures regardless of the change of environment.

Some Chu people waded in the river, and their swords fell from the boat into the water. They signed their names on their boat and said, "My sword fell off the boat." The ship stopped at the destination, and the Chu people jumped into the water from the marked place to find the sword.

The ship has sailed, but the sword has not moved. Isn't it very confusing to look for the sword like this?

Translation of "Carving a Boat for a Sword"

A man in the state of Chu crossed the river, and his sword fell from the boat into the water. (He) immediately carved a mark on the boat and said, "This is where my sword fell." The ship stopped (later) and (the man) went into the water from the marked place to look for the sword. The boat moved, but the sword didn't move (after falling into the water). Is it stupid to look for a sword like this?

5. How to translate the classical Chinese of Lv's Spring and Autumn Annals into the original? If you are immoral, you will be punished for it.