In fact, ordinary families spend a lot of money, or entrust people to find relationships, so that their children can go to a better primary school. This problem really needs to be done according to their ability. A good school must have different teaching quality and children's learning environment. It's also different.

If you want your children to receive a better education, you can go to a better primary school, but it should be within the family's economic scope. You can't say that your family can't afford such a good school, so it is not advisable for your children to receive such an education. After all, the education of students in primary schools is similar. A good school can only make children grow up well.

In fact, although many schools are public, his teaching quality is also good, and children from ordinary families. I think it's enough to attend classes in this kind of school. In fact, children's education depends at most on their own development. A good school can give children a better environment and make many high-quality friends, but it cannot be said that the teaching quality of ordinary schools is poor.

Ordinary schools can't bring better education to children, and it's a bit arbitrary to make a decision. If you want children to receive a better education from an early age, you should choose within the scope of family commitment, and don't make it difficult for families because of children. It is not good for children's development.