The pattern is not so high, everyone has it, which is our cognitive level.

We say that someone has a big pattern, and the popular explanation is that he has a high level of cognition and can see things that ordinary people can't see.

On the cognitive level, we can only look at it from top to bottom, not from bottom to top. Every time we upgrade one level, we can see much more scenery. However, it is difficult for people at the lower level to understand the upper level just by imagination.

We do not live in the same world in essence, because the world is a spiritual entity. Most people have roughly the same facial features. For example, most people can distinguish color from sound, but some people can't. Their world is different from that of most people. If everyone's senses such as eyes or ears are changed, the world will become another way, but you really think that this is of course an objective fact, but it's just that your receiver has changed.

If the five senses are the primary judgment of human self-righteousness about the world information, then cognition is the advanced judgment of human self-righteousness about the world mechanism. If the change of recipients similar to the five senses can change the fundamental appearance of the world (actually it is an illusion), then the cognitive difference can also make us live in different spiritual spaces.

So sometimes we think, how can he not mind this? How can you not mind? It must be faking it. But what makes people angry is that he doesn't seem to mind, but he doesn't care at all. This is the difference between the world as a spiritual entity.

Next, let's briefly talk about all aspects of the pattern.

0 1 learning mode

When I was studying in the past, I found a phenomenon that those students with particularly good grades are particularly easy to share with others. If you have any questions, ask him, and he will tell you exactly what he can do. Of course, there are times when he can't, especially shameless questions. Even if your grades are not as good as his, he doesn't feel "humiliated" because he knows that no matter how good your grades are, it is impossible to really include all those whose knowledge is not as good as his.

Some people are different. If you can't ask him any questions, even if he knows, he will just find a reason to send you away, but he can't ask you what he doesn't understand because of the lack of "exchange chips" Such people's achievements are often near the middle reaches, at most above the middle reaches. They belong to the kind that looks not too stupid and may be a little cautious in the eyes of stupid people, but in fact their intelligence is also relatively low.

Some people may ask, what about those students below the middle reaches? Because they don't often have the opportunity to answer other people's questions, they are not in the discussion.

Why do they behave so differently? In essence, because of their different models, their world is also different.

In the eyes of people with higher cognitive ability, the ranking in the class is actually meaningless, because we go to school to learn knowledge. Since I am learning knowledge, it is only meaningful to compare with myself, as long as I know more today than yesterday. Hindering the progress of others will not only help me, but also lower the average level of my own group, so that my height may be affected in the future.

Even from the incorrect utilitarian purpose, we study to get into a good university and find a good job in the future, so the ranking in the class is also meaningless. Because your college entrance examination results are ranked nationwide, there is no essential difference between the rankings 100000 and 10000 1, and it is useless for you to pull down the scores of several people.

People with low cognitive ability are different. They only pay attention to their small world class, and class ranking is all they have. Even some parents think so. As long as the class ranking drops, it must be a step backwards, which is very ridiculous. Therefore, for them, this is a zero-sum game. If one person falls behind, it means that one person has made progress. This truth sounds stupid, but in reality many people will make such mistakes, because their world is so big, so they can only see so far.

Workplace model

The cognitive level gap in learning determines our behavior, and behavior itself determines our height. The same is true in the workplace.

Few people in the workplace can be self-centered. The workplace is a person's practice, and there are no nonsense companions and opponents. In a few years, after further market segmentation and informatization, everyone's feelings may be more obvious. Your income is a true reflection of your value. In the incomplete market, Mr. Nan Guo Can still clings to the light of the platform, but this hitchhiking behavior will soon disappear.

In recent years, I have met too many people in a fog. They have been comparing horizontally. Why can't I be lazy when my colleagues are lazy? Why can't colleagues be delayed when they are laid off? I wonder if my colleagues will follow me when they go out begging.

Many people regard work as piecework payment. How long I stayed here today, how much money you gave me and how much food I could exchange. This is a very primitive conversion method. Then why did the boss set up a punch card machine and check the post? It is because such employees are everywhere, and then employees and bosses fight with each other and spend precious energy on such meaningless things.

The workplace is like playing chess. Playing chess focuses on layout, which is career planning. When we play chess, we need to know why. If you earn more than 200 a month and give up the original layout, then your layout is worth the price.

People with higher cognitive level will not pay attention to such a place at all. They know their layout, what they are doing all the time and what role they can play. When there are unexpected disturbances, they will adjust the layout in real time, but they always focus on the whole future, which is the embodiment of their control as a helmsman. For them, the future has already arrived ahead of time, but the path to realization is very different.

On this lonely road, why don't companions and enemies exist?

Because they are all changing in real time and even transforming each other, if you put too much thought into them, it is easy to do nothing. Many great companies only focus on themselves. While you are constantly being awesome, the enemy can't keep pace, so naturally he doesn't deserve to be your enemy. What did you do to him? This is the same as staring at the class ranking.

If you improve the model, you can see a bigger world. This feeling is like "lying in the trough, why didn't I think of it before?" This shows that you received a higher level of information, which you deserve. Before this message appeared, you almost wanted to break your head and couldn't pass that level.

mode of life

All patterns can be included in the pattern of life, including the above study and workplace, as well as love, friendship, money, time and so on. The cognition of each slice is a part of it.

Secular understanding, that is, most people's cognition of something, often represents a medium level of cognition. For example, I saw a huge secular cognitive group when Dānlín cheated on me a few days ago. Many people can't go beyond this level, but they can't think at all, because they can't see the upper level, and they will think that their cognitive level is the highest level. Even if the upper level is the same, at least they can see where the ordinary people who eat melons are.

This kind of practice in life is a process of constantly improving the pattern. As for those things that are generally recognized by society as reflecting the success of life, such as money, they are just by-products.

When your cognitive level reaches a certain stage, money is only a question of whether you want it or not, and there is no question of whether you can. It's just an incidental product. But is the cognitive level of the rich really higher? That's not true. Some people can become rich by luck. After all, life is only a few decades, and the money saved by luck may not be wasted.

In the past, we said that "the right match" actually refers to the cognitive level, but many people always understand it as money. The reason why pheasants don't deserve phoenix is that phoenix is unimaginable to pheasants on the cognitive level, because their growth environment, education and knowledge are different, and these differences are largely due to money, so many people think that proper collocation means money.

But this is not absolute, just a high probability screening. There is also a particularly high pattern of children in poor families, and a particularly shallow pattern of children in rich families. Therefore, although the social class is indeed solidified in most people, it is still mobile in a small number of people.

When we stand in a higher place, we will look down on these things and then we can see them more clearly.

For example, affection, love, friendship and other feelings are all things you use to fill your spirit. The more blank your mind is, the more you need these things. On the contrary, when you can create them with your own brain, there is no need to look for them.

Many people will find it mysterious. Isn't this a bluff? In fact, this is a typical cognitive level difference. Because I can't see or understand, I feel that it doesn't exist, so I feel like a fool.

Space is limited, just give the simplest example.

We all know that love has a shelf life. This shelf life is not defined by "I have been with XX for XX years", but how long you have been together day and night. Generally speaking, the human body will produce antibodies against substances such as dopamine, phenylethylamine, serotonin and oxytocin secreted by a specific object within two years, so even if your object is Fan Bingbing or Hugh.

From this time on, the temptation of cheating will increase greatly, because everyone is addicted to the stimulation of these chemicals, and for most people, the object that can make them secrete is no longer the person around you.

If your partner is attractive enough and often tempted, you can't expect him or her to remain loyal with willpower. I once said in an article that willpower is a scarce resource and cannot be protected 24 hours a day.

Under such circumstances, is there any way to keep the other half off the list? There is still some, that is, to help improve his or her cognitive level. That's what I meant when I said that "wisdom can offset part of human nature".

People with high cognitive level can create the above chemicals with spirit. Therefore, two people with high cognitive level can grow old together, and they can really grow old together, instead of what we usually think of as "love becomes family." I'm looking for the other half. Why do I need affection? If you become close, what is the difference with my brother or best friend?

Therefore, two people who can create the above-mentioned chemicals through spirit can always maintain attraction between them, thus greatly enhancing their defense against external invasion.

Manually insert the dividing line ————————————————————

So, how to improve your own pattern?

0 1 know how to distinguish grades.

What does a good cook need to satisfy? Maybe you will talk a lot about his professional skills, but the most basic thing is not these, but having a good tongue.

Jiro Ono said: If my tongue is not as good as the guest's, then I can't do things that please the guest. The reason is also obvious. You can't tell the subtle differences between similar tastes and tastes, and naturally you will give rough things to guests who require fine, which can't be compensated by your high technology.

Then the first goal of our upgrade is that although we can't see the concrete world at some level, at least we should be able to see a broader world there, which is also the basis of our progress.

How? I call him-tearing down his own building blocks.

Building blocks represent your accumulation. Once built, they will produce a by-product called "I represent right". Don't think that this by-product is easy to handle. Many people think that they can accommodate different voices from their minds, but for most people, this is just a manifestation of "I represent right".

Your knowledge is accumulated over time, including fixed knowledge, problem-solving methods, thinking patterns and so on. It can't be formed overnight. However, if I say that you have practiced an evil kung fu and reached the rising ceiling, I am afraid you are very resistant to the supreme method that requires you to abandon martial arts and practice the right path again. You can't give up your accumulation, so even if you vaguely know that I may be right, you will find an excuse to say that there is no magic method, which is a fart.

The reason why our pattern can't be improved is that we can't see or don't want to see a higher level of cognition at all. We are used to resisting different voices, and its essence is that we are unwilling to push down the building blocks we built.

Encouraging everyone to dismantle building blocks here does not mean encouraging everyone to have no opinions, but everyone needs to be aware of their limitations. Cows are stubborn because they can see the incompetence of others, and cows are stubborn because they are not afraid of anything.

Therefore, the first rule of improving the model: you can see the levels of different models, and the way to achieve it is to let the "sunk cost sink".

Longer time and more space.

After we have the ability of stratification, we will have humility, but this alone is not enough. We need to learn to look at problems from a longer time span and a larger space span.

I began to learn chess at the age of five and soon understood this truth.

When I was very young, I didn't have systematic training, so my hand layout was very poor, but I can win many adults for only one reason. I can walk a few more steps than them. Often start from a disadvantage and get it back slowly. Why is it so important to walk a few more steps? Because it is very simple, the optimal solution you think of within 3 steps may be the most smelly within 5 steps.

On the official account of WeChat, after I finished writing the article "Pattern", a reader left me a message saying that you said not to focus on the class ranking, but the former 10 students can take the postgraduate entrance examination, while the former 1 1 students can't. I will take this as an example.

Anyone who has read that article knows that not paying attention to class ranking means looking at the overall situation, not stopping progress, but looking at the overall situation, which is precisely paying attention to one's own progress, not the small regional ranking itself.

Everyone's value is the sum of all his aspects, so we can improve our value by making progress in any aspect while keeping other aspects unchanged.

If A's ability value is 100, and his ranking in his own class is 1 1, he has no chance to apply for graduate students. And B's ability value is 90, but because he successfully dragged down several competitors (also reduced his ability in disguise), he ranked 10 in the class, so B guaranteed to study. So, is B better than A?

This is a typical limitation of vision. The ability value of A is 100. Just because he has not been selected for the number of places for insurance research does not mean that he has no strength for insurance research. He can get a postgraduate degree on his own, and he doesn't need a postgraduate degree. Of course, the future is unpredictable. Maybe something happened on the day of exam A, and I didn't get in, but does this mean that B's strategy is correct?

B may be complacent about his strategy, but when we look at the time span, we may find that this is not the case. Stretching the time span, you will find that a person's choice at a certain point in time was correct at that time, but if you look at it from 20 years later, it is probably not better than another choice. Some people say that the choice of key points is more important than hard work, but this is actually wise after the event. No matter how "correct" your choice is, you can only say "correct" after it happens to be verified afterwards, and you can't prove the "wrong" of the other road at all.

So why should we pay attention to ourselves? Because when you lengthen the time span, you will find that the only way to improve your mobility in probability is to focus on the cultivation of your own value. The rest is beyond your control, and it doesn't matter whether it is good or bad, because good or bad can only be subjectively identified after a long time.

What about a larger spatial span? This is also the case.

When we focus on our own acre of land, we make a decision that seems most suitable for us, and we give the most correct evaluation. But when you expand the focus circle, the correct decision and subjective evaluation just now may no longer be correct, and these are influenced by the changes of space and objects in space, so the rules will change accordingly.

Everyone is looking at the world through their own binoculars, but some people's tubes are bigger, some people's tubes are smaller, and those tubes are smaller. People who are essentially bigger than tubes see less content and are relatively far from the truth. Of course, this does not mean that those who are more in charge will see the truth, because we can only get close to the truth in the end.

Therefore, the second rule of the promotion model: when we look at problems, analyze problems and solve problems with a longer time span and a larger space span, no matter how absurd the conclusion you get seems, it is better than the previous thinking.

Go straight to the heart of the problem

When we know how to look at things, we should make more adjustments in practice, because no knowledge exists in the form of clever writing, and continuous practice can make you different.

Then let's talk about the third item. No matter what perspective we use to look at the problem, we must learn to go straight to the core of things.

Everything has its own core, and this is how it works. When you want to observe, analyze and evaluate, remember to dig out its core.

For example, many people say that love has different understandings.

How can it be? There is only one core of things. If everyone has his own understanding, it is wrong, but each has its own mistakes. Just like a blind man touching an elephant, you touch your leg and say it's a pillar, and I touch my nose and say it's a pipe.

Love is a chemical reaction, you will know when you understand it. There are not so many mysterious things. If you want to keep getting rewards from the reward center in your brain, you have to be kind to each other, because when you want to return, your reward center will bring you good feelings. What you want is this.

When the reward center no longer gives rewards, in fact, love has disappeared, leaving only a cooperative relationship, or a decision that is most beneficial to you because you don't want to change some existing habits, or because of moral pressure.

Knowing this, many people say that true love asks for nothing in return. Don't you know this is nonsense? What can a person do without asking for anything in return? He won't do anything because he has no reason to do it. He can look "selfless dedication", in fact, he is also pursuing another feeling in his heart, which may be more enjoyable for him.

What about those who have taken care of vegetative wives for decades? I once said in an article about marriage that either I had to set up a memorial arch under the pressure of public opinion, or I had a strong sense of moral responsibility, or I had a very good relationship with my wife before, and now I don't want to give up the sunk cost, or I can only make myself happier by taking care of her, otherwise I will be condemned by my heart, so I am still doing it for myself in essence. Just for yourself and others.

It's just a question of whether the interests are consistent. Where is love?

So some things are very obvious in the eyes of some people, but in the eyes of others, it seems difficult to accept. The mode of promotion is to get rid of the "unacceptable" emotion. No matter how different the core of the matter is from your previous education (many of our education is nonsense), it is there. You can't say "unacceptable" is correct now, because you have been brainwashed by a magic stick since you were a child, so you will never find it.

Speaking of this, many people may ask another question, that is, I haven't the ability to hit the core of things yet, and I always can't think of the point. What should I do? It doesn't matter. Let's start by adjusting our cognitive system.

Everyone has his own cognitive system, which includes a set of judgment methodology. This system determines your way of thinking and your mode.

Except for conditioned reflex, almost everything we encounter will go through this system and then produce our unique judgment. Therefore, to have the ability to directly hit the core of things, we must adjust this system, and it is a directional adjustment. Just like gardeners, we will cut things that are useless or even harmful, and then add new things to it very carefully.

Of course, in this process, you will constantly feel that your system is very simple, which is no problem. Revision is a long-term process, and reinventing it is an achievement that can be achieved unconsciously, not solved by a few epiphanies.

Therefore, the third promotion mode: directly hit the core of things. The way to achieve this is to directionally correct your cognitive system.

Ok, let's write here first, I hope it will help you.