The first trial of Jiaozuo female teacher v. Education Bureau was rejected. What did she ask for? The court of Shanyang District of Jiaozuo City made a first-instance judgment on the case of Yao Yanyan v. Education Bureau of Shanyang District of Jiaozuo City for failing to handle teachers' complaints: because the lawsuit filed by Yao Yanyan did not meet the statutory conditions for prosecution, the Shanyang District People's Court ruled that Yao Yanyan's lawsuit was rejected according to law.
Event review:
In June 2020165438+1October, Yao Yanyan, a female teacher in Jiaozuo City, reported that the selection of senior titles in the school was unfair. There are 6 selection indicators, and 17 people stand for election. Her total score ranked second, but she lost the vote. This matter has aroused great concern.
On March 29, the incident continued to ferment. On March 30th, the Education Bureau of Shanyang District issued a notice of Jiaozuo No.17 Middle School, saying that Yao Yanyan had been removed from the post of class teacher, and ordered to delete false statements and write an inspection. Yao Yanyan refused to accept her mistake. The circular also stated that, in view of Yao Yanyan's publishing false information on the Internet, which had a serious adverse impact on the school, on March 22nd, the general party branch of the school submitted the Proposal on Punishment of Comrade Yao Yanyan to the Party Group of the District Education Bureau, and ordered Yao Yanyan to suspend classes and cooperate with the investigation. On the afternoon of March 29th, Yao Yanyan refused to cooperate when she was informed of her rights and obligations by the school before the case review interview. On March 3 1, the case was heard in the live broadcast hall of Shanyang District Court. On April 12, the latest response of the Shanyang District Court of Jiaozuo City: the prosecution was dismissed!
The Education Bureau of Shanyang District issued a briefing in a very cooperative manner, saying that it would continue to keep in touch with teacher Yao Yanyan and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of teachers in accordance with the law.
From the perspective of respecting the judiciary, what is the Education Bureau? Sincerity? Apologize Although the object of apology is vague and ambiguous, although I think they deviated from Mr. Yao when they bowed in the word game, they said? The word apology is not easy either. I have to say that this is a great victory.
In this regard, how do you think that the case of Jiaozuo female teacher v. Education Bureau was rejected in the first instance?