Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - Is it because the poor don't pay attention to their children's education as the rich do?
Is it because the poor don't pay attention to their children's education as the rich do?
The event that Guo Jingjing, the "diving queen", and her husband Huo took their children to transplant rice seedlings has attracted the attention of many people and many education experts. You know, the couple are rich and can provide their children with a luxurious life, but they are not arrogant to their children at all. Instead, they often accompany their children to experience various lives. Their experience has also made many people understand that the real enrichment is not to provide children with rich food, but to give them spiritual satisfaction, so that they have more capital to stand on this land independently, confidently and strongly.

On the internet, many people say that "the richer the family, the more attention it pays to their children's education, and the poorer the family, the more useless it is for their children to study." This sentence caused a heated discussion among netizens. I want to know which view you agree with:

One thinks that this idea is right, because wealthy families often have high-quality parents and naturally pay more attention to their children's education; One thinks it is wrong, because a poor family can give birth to a noble child; One thinks that the economic gap leads the rich to pay more attention to their children's education, while the poor do not want to pay attention to their children's education, but because they have no money, they are unable to provide better education for their children. I think the richer the family, the more capital they have to pay attention to their children's education, while the poorer the family, the first is limited level, the second is limited economy, and the third is limited vision, which leads to the neglect of their children's education. These reasons really hurt the hearts of young parents.

1. Parents' different education levels lead to different degrees of attention to their children's education.

We can't say that the higher the education level, the richer it is, but money does have something to do with education. Often a person with high academic qualifications and strong ability can get more money. Education determines ability, and ability determines money, so rich people often receive a good education, and they also hope that their children can master more abilities through education, so as to gain more life value and wealth.

Parents with a high level of education not only know more about the importance of education, but also know more about the ways and means of education. They can provide more reference opinions for their children in education, and at the same time, they can subtly let their children follow their example and grow into excellent people more easily.

2. Parents' different financial abilities lead to different levels of education for their children.

When a person is exhausted for survival, it is difficult to have time and energy to think about children's education. Now many parents work in cities and send their children back to their hometown in the countryside to be raised by the elderly. Working hard all day can only support children, but it can't provide them with more educational support or even more emotional care.

Because of their different financial abilities, wealthy parents can easily hire good teachers and schools for their children and cultivate their hobbies, while poor parents can only provide their children with food and clothing and compulsory education. As for the extent to which their children finally learn, it depends entirely on their own efforts.

3. Parents' different horizons lead to different views on children's education.

Today's universities are different from those in the past. Many college students can't find suitable jobs after graduation, and many still return to the countryside. Some rural parents think that they have worked hard to save money for their children to go to college, but they still don't have a good job after graduation. If I had known this, I would have let him work. How nice it would be to build a house with this money. This has led many people to think that "reading is useless".

Rich people tend to have wider horizons and see more markets. They let their children study not only to find jobs in the future, but also for the development of their abilities. Therefore, even if their children can't find a good job in the future, their children still have a lot of opportunities, and there are still many possibilities in life.

Because of their different horizons, poor people train their children to go to school mainly to find jobs and earn money. Once the goal is not achieved, they feel that learning is useless. Rich people train their children to go to college more to cultivate their abilities and let them get more resources. Even if their goals are not achieved, their children still have many advantages. It is precisely because parents have different horizons, different pursuits and different purposes of educating their children that their views on children's education are completely opposite.