First, the evaluation process
1, understand the evaluation criteria: teachers need to understand the evaluation criteria of professional titles, including educational experience, teaching achievements, student evaluation, professional skills and other requirements.
2. Submit application: Teachers need to submit an application for professional title evaluation to their school or education department, and provide relevant materials, such as personal resume, teaching achievement report, student evaluation, etc.
3. Audit: The school or education department will organize an audit committee to audit the applicant's materials and conduct interviews or field visits to the applicant.
4. Publicize the results: The evaluation results will be publicized on the website of the school or education department, and the applicant can object to the results within the specified time.
5. Obtaining a certificate: Applicants who have passed the evaluation will obtain the corresponding professional title certificate, which proves that they have the corresponding professional ability in the field of education.
Second, the evaluation requirements
1. Education: Teachers need bachelor degree or above, and different levels of professional titles have different education.
2. Teaching achievements: Teachers need to have certain teaching achievements, including publishing papers, participating in scientific research projects and winning teaching awards.
3. Student evaluation: Teachers need to be recognized and praised by students and parents, including teaching quality, teaching methods and service attitude.
4, professional skills: teachers need to have certain professional skills, including teaching methods, teaching materials processing, examination analysis, etc.
Common problems in the evaluation of teachers' professional titles
First, the evaluation criteria are not clear.
In many places, the evaluation criteria of teachers' professional titles are not transparent enough, which leads to many teachers' inability to accurately understand and meet the evaluation requirements. This may be due to the complicated evaluation process or unclear interpretation of standards and rules.
Second, the requirements for scientific research results are high.
In some cases, teachers are required to submit high-quality scientific research results as a necessary condition for evaluating professional titles. However, due to the limitation of time and resources, many teachers may not meet these high standards, which may lead to their unsuccessful promotion.
Third, teaching ability is neglected.
Although teaching is the main responsibility of teachers, in some places, the evaluation process may overemphasize scientific research results and ignore the teaching quality and the effectiveness of teaching methods. This may lead to some teachers with excellent teaching ability not being recognized as they deserve.
Fourth, subjective factors.
Human factors in the evaluation process may lead to unfair results. For example, if the subjective preference or prejudice of the members of the evaluation committee affects the evaluation results, it may lead to unfair results.
Fifth, lack of feedback mechanism.
Many times, teachers can only wait for the evaluation results, and they don't know the specific details of the evaluation process, and they don't know why they didn't get promoted. Lack of transparency and feedback mechanism may lead to teachers' confusion and disappointment.