Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational institution - Which is more serious, informed criticism and Admonishing?
Which is more serious, informed criticism and Admonishing?
Legal analysis: 1, informed criticism is serious, and it was published. The admonition conversation is private and small-scale.

2. Admonishing Conversation If party member and cadres who have slight disciplinary violations or problems with signs and tendencies are engaged in conversation and admonishing education, they should say hello in advance, promptly remind and educate them.

The purpose of saving. Admonishing conversation should be strict, point out its existing problems, distinguish between right and wrong responsibilities, urge rectification, help them learn lessons, prevent delay, and make the interviewee commit less or not.

Mistake.

3. informed criticism is a measure to make mistakes public within a certain range. I hope the perpetrators or others can learn a lesson and take it as a warning.

Legal basis: Article 8 of the China Regulations on Disciplinary Actions against party member: warning; Serious warning; Revocation of duties within the party; Stay in the party for observation; Expel from the party. Party member shall not be promoted within the Party or recommended to non-party organizations to hold a post higher than his original post within one year after being warned and one and a half years after being severely warned.

Party organizations that violate Party discipline shall be ordered to make inspections or informed criticism. Party organizations that seriously violate the party's discipline and cannot be corrected by themselves can be reorganized according to the seriousness of the case after inspection and verification by the higher party Committee; Fired